Tanabe Paula, Kyriacou Demetrios N, Garland Franklyn
Institute for Health Services Research and Policy Studies, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 417 S. Jefferson #408, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):897-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00637.x.
To evaluate simultaneously several possible risk factors for blood bank specimen hemolysis.
This was a prospective cohort study of emergency department and labor and delivery patients to estimate the effect of various factors on the risk of blood bank specimen hemolysis. Study variables included patient demographics, type and gauge of needle or catheter, anatomic location of venipuncture, and patient care area. Hemolysis was determined by blood bank laboratory technicians. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression modeling was performed to estimate the adjusted relative risks for hemolysis.
Of the 605 subjects with complete data, 194 (32.1%) subjects had blood specimens drawn directly with a steel needle, and 411 (69.1%) had specimens drawn through a Vialon (BD Medical Systems, Inc., Sandy, UT) intravenous (IV) angiocatheter. The overall risk of hemolysis for all was 7%, 10% for Vialon IV angiocatheters and 1.5% for steel needles. In the multivariate analysis, the factors most closely associated with hemolysis were the use of Vialon IV catheters and sampling from an anatomic site other than the antecubital area.
Blood bank specimens drawn from Vialon IV catheters (particularly smaller gauge catheters) and from veins outside the antecubital area are at significantly increased risk to hemolyze.
同时评估血库标本溶血的几种可能危险因素。
这是一项针对急诊科、分娩科患者的前瞻性队列研究,旨在评估各种因素对血库标本溶血风险的影响。研究变量包括患者人口统计学信息、针头或导管的类型及规格、静脉穿刺的解剖位置以及患者护理区域。溶血情况由血库实验室技术人员判定。采用Cox比例风险多元回归模型来估计溶血的校正相对风险。
在605例有完整数据的受试者中,194例(32.1%)受试者的血标本直接用钢针采集,411例(69.1%)受试者的标本通过Vialon(BD医疗系统公司,犹他州桑迪)静脉(IV)留置针采集。总体溶血风险为7%,Vialon IV留置针的溶血风险为10%,钢针的溶血风险为1.5%。在多因素分析中,与溶血密切相关的因素是使用Vialon IV导管以及从肘前区域以外的解剖部位采样。
从Vialon IV导管(尤其是较细规格的导管)以及肘前区域以外的静脉采集的血库标本溶血风险显著增加。