Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):387-395. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00663-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
The dynamic response (DR) of the arterial pressure monitoring system (APMS) may depend on the intraarterial catheter (IAC) diameter. We hypothesized that adequate DR would be more common when using a smaller IAC. We compared the DR of the AMPS (Auto Transducer™) between three IACs (BD Angiocath Plus™) with different diameters. 353 neurosurgical patients were randomized into three groups undergoing catheterization with a 20-, 22-, or 24-gauge IAC: 20G (n = 119), 22G (n = 117), and 24G (n = 117) groups, respectively. The DR, which depends on the natural frequency and damping coefficient, was divided into four types: adequate (primary outcome measure), underdamped, overdamped, and unacceptable. The frequency of intraoperative IAC malfunction was noted. Adequate DR was observed more frequently in the 22G and 24G groups than the 20G group (13.7% and 15.4% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.011 and 0.004, respectively). The frequency of underdamped DR was higher in the 20G group than the 24G group (86.6% vs. 69.2%, P = 0.001), whereas overdamped DR was more frequent in the 24G group than the 20G and 22G groups (6.0% vs. 0.0% and 0.0%, P = 0.007 and 0.014, respectively). IAC malfunctioned more frequently during surgery in the 24G group than the 20G and 22G groups (15.4% vs. 0.0% and 1.7%, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The frequency of adequate DR was low regardless of the IAC diameter. Nonetheless, in terms of DR and IAC malfunction, a 22-gauge BD Angiocath Plus™ was more suitable for invasive blood pressure monitoring with Auto Transducer™ than a 20- or 24-gauge BD Angiocath Plus™. Registration Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT03642756. Date of Registration: July 27, 2018.
动脉压力监测系统 (APMS) 的动态响应 (DR) 可能取决于内置导管 (IAC) 的直径。我们假设使用较小直径的 IAC 时,DR 会更充分。我们比较了三种不同直径的 IAC(BD Angiocath Plus™)的 AMPS(Auto Transducer™)的 DR。353 名神经外科患者被随机分为三组,分别接受 20 、 22 或 24 号 IAC 置管:20G(n=119)、22G(n=117)和 24G(n=117)组。DR 取决于固有频率和阻尼系数,分为四种类型:充分(主要观察指标)、欠阻尼、过阻尼和不可接受。术中记录 IAC 故障的频率。22G 和 24G 组的充分 DR 比 20G 组更常见(13.7%和 15.4%比 4.2%,P=0.011 和 0.004)。20G 组的欠阻尼 DR 频率高于 24G 组(86.6%比 69.2%,P=0.001),而 24G 组的过阻尼 DR 频率高于 20G 和 22G 组(6.0%比 0.0%和 0.0%,P=0.007 和 0.014)。术中 24G 组的 IAC 故障频率高于 20G 和 22G 组(15.4%比 0.0%和 1.7%,P<0.001 和 P<0.001)。无论 IAC 直径如何,充分 DR 的频率都较低。尽管如此,在 DR 和 IAC 故障方面,22G 号 BD Angiocath Plus™比 20 或 24G 号 BD Angiocath Plus™更适合 Auto Transducer™的有创血压监测。
请注意,这是一个机器翻译的结果,可能存在不准确或不通顺的地方,如果你需要更准确的翻译,请提供更多的上下文信息。