Pennock Steven, Wang Zhixiang
Department of Cell Biology and Signal Transduction Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada.
Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Aug;23(16):5803-15. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.16.5803-5815.2003.
Strong evidence indicates that endosome-localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in cell signaling. However, elimination of endosomal signaling does not attenuate EGF-induced physiological outcomes, arguing against physiological relevance. Recently we established a system to specifically activate endosome-associated EGFR in the absence of any plasma membrane activation of EGFR and showed that endosomal EGFR signaling is sufficient to support cell survival. However, this pure endosomal signaling of EGFR does not stimulate cell proliferation, because EGFR only remained activated for less than 2 h following its stimulation at endosomes, while DNA synthesis generally requires growth factor exposure for 8 h or more. Here we report that the prolonged requirement for EGF to stimulate epithelial cell proliferation can be substituted for with two short pulses of EGF. By combining the two short pulses of EGF stimulation with our previously established method to generate endosomal EGFR signaling, we are able to generate two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling. In this way, we demonstrated that two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling are sufficient to stimulate cell proliferation. The first pulse of EGFR signaling induces exit from quiescence into G(1) phase and appears to render cells responsive to subsequent mitogenic stimulus. This second pulse, required several hours later, drives cells through the restriction point of late G(1) and into S phase. We further showed that the two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling engaged cell cycle machinery the same way as the two pulses of standard EGFR signaling. Moreover, two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling stimulated downstream signaling cascades in a similar way to the two pulses of standard EGFR activation. The data therefore demonstrate that signals transduced from internalized EGFR, with or without a contribution from the plasma membrane, fully satisfy the physiological requirements for S-phase entry.
有力证据表明,定位于内体的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)在细胞信号传导中起重要作用。然而,消除内体信号传导并不会减弱表皮生长因子(EGF)诱导的生理结果,这与生理相关性相悖。最近,我们建立了一个系统,在没有任何EGFR质膜激活的情况下特异性激活与内体相关的EGFR,并表明内体EGFR信号传导足以支持细胞存活。然而,这种纯内体EGFR信号传导不会刺激细胞增殖,因为EGFR在内体受到刺激后仅保持激活状态不到2小时,而DNA合成通常需要生长因子暴露8小时或更长时间。在此我们报告,刺激上皮细胞增殖对EGF的长期需求可用两个短脉冲的EGF替代。通过将两个短脉冲的EGF刺激与我们先前建立的产生内体EGFR信号传导的方法相结合,我们能够产生两个脉冲的内体EGFR信号传导。通过这种方式,我们证明两个脉冲的内体EGFR信号传导足以刺激细胞增殖。EGFR信号传导的第一个脉冲诱导细胞从静止期进入G1期,并且似乎使细胞对随后的有丝分裂刺激产生反应。几个小时后所需的第二个脉冲驱动细胞通过G1晚期的限制点并进入S期。我们进一步表明,两个脉冲的内体EGFR信号传导与两个脉冲的标准EGFR信号传导以相同方式参与细胞周期机制。此外,两个脉冲的内体EGFR信号传导以与两个脉冲的标准EGFR激活类似的方式刺激下游信号级联反应。因此,数据表明,从内化的EGFR转导的信号,无论有无质膜的贡献,都完全满足进入S期的生理需求。