Tucker J, Farmer J, Stimpson P
Dugald Baird Centre for Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZL, UK.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):286-90. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.286.
To assess the diagnosis and management of mild non-proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy in rural general practices against guideline recommendations.
Postal survey and telephone interview.
All 174 designated rural general practices in Scotland.
171 GPs and 158 midwives responsible for antenatal care stratified by distance from a specialist maternity hospital.
Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management compared with guideline.
At least one respondent replied for 91% (158/174) of rural practices. Response rates were 68% (117/170) for GPs and 77% (121/158) for midwives. Both GP and midwife replied for 46% (80/174) of practices. Most GPs (80%, 87/109) and midwives (63%, 71/113) overdiagnosed the scenario. Intended management was therefore most often referral or admission to specialist hospital (59%, 132/224), both courses of action beyond guideline recommendations. There was an association between distance of practice from specialist maternity hospital and professionals' report of intended referral or admission. Explanatory factors from telephone interviews included a poor knowledge base, cautious risk assessment, and perceived inflexibility of guidelines for remote situations.
There is a lack of accuracy in the diagnosis of a common antenatal problem and intended management is consistent with overdiagnosis. The results suggest that women in rural settings may experience more antenatal referrals and admissions than are clinically appropriate according to the guidelines. At a time of increasing centralisation of maternity services, this could increase inappropriate referrals and increase costs to service and patients. Quality of care may be improved by developing consensual local guidelines with rural maternity care professionals and support maintained skills and confidence in decision making.
根据指南建议,评估农村普通医疗实践中妊娠合并轻度非蛋白尿性高血压的诊断与管理情况。
邮寄调查和电话访谈。
苏格兰所有174家指定的农村普通医疗诊所。
171名全科医生和158名负责产前护理的助产士,按与专科医院的距离分层。
与指南相比,诊断的准确性和管理的适当性。
91%(158/174)的农村诊所至少有一名受访者回复。全科医生的回复率为68%(117/170),助产士的回复率为77%(121/158)。46%(80/174)的诊所同时有全科医生和助产士回复。大多数全科医生(80%,87/109)和助产士(63%,71/113)对该病例诊断过度。因此,预期的管理措施最常见的是转诊或入住专科医院(59%,132/224),这两种措施均超出了指南建议。诊所与专科医院的距离和专业人员报告的预期转诊或入院之间存在关联。电话访谈中的解释因素包括知识基础薄弱、风险评估谨慎以及认为指南在偏远地区缺乏灵活性。
常见产前问题的诊断缺乏准确性,预期管理与诊断过度一致。结果表明,农村地区的女性可能会经历比指南临床建议更多的产前转诊和入院。在产科服务日益集中的时期,这可能会增加不适当的转诊并增加服务和患者的成本。通过与农村产科护理专业人员制定共识性的地方指南,并维持决策技能和信心的支持,可能会提高护理质量。