Tucker J, Hundley V, Kiger A, Bryers H, Caldow J, Farmer J, Harris F, Ireland J, van Teijlingen E
Dugald Baird Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen AB25 2ZL, UK.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):34-40. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010561.
To explore staff views on their roles, skills and training to deliver high quality and local intrapartum services in remote and rural settings against national recommendations.
Interview and postal survey.
A stratified representative sample of remote and rural maternity units in Scotland (December 2002 to May 2003).
Staff proportionally representative of professional groups involved in maternity care.
Staff interviews took place at 11 units (response rate 93%). A subsequent postal survey included the interview sample and staff in a further 11 units (response rate 78%). Medical specialisation, workforce issues, and proposed regulatory evaluation of competencies linked to throughput raised concerns about the sustainability and safety of services, particularly for "generalists" in rural maternity care teams and for medical cover in small district general hospitals with large rural catchments. Risk assessment and decision making to transfer were seen as central for effective rural practice and these were influenced by rural context. Staff self-reported competence and confidence varied according to procedure, but noted service change appeared to be underway ahead of their preparedness. Self-reported competence in managing obstetric emergencies was surprisingly high, with the caveat that they were not independently assessed in this study. Staff with access to video conference technology reported low actual use although there was enthusiasm about its potential use.
Considerable uncertainties remain around staffing models and training to maintain maternity care team skills and competencies. Further research is required to test how this will impact on safety, appropriateness, and access and acceptability to rural communities.
根据国家建议,探讨工作人员对其在偏远和农村地区提供高质量本地分娩服务的角色、技能和培训的看法。
访谈和邮政调查。
苏格兰偏远和农村产科单位的分层代表性样本(2002年12月至2003年5月)。
参与产科护理的专业群体中具有比例代表性的工作人员。
在11个单位进行了工作人员访谈(回复率93%)。随后的邮政调查包括访谈样本以及另外11个单位的工作人员(回复率78%)。医学专业化、劳动力问题以及与通量相关的能力的拟议监管评估引发了对服务可持续性和安全性的担忧,特别是对于农村产科护理团队中的“通才”以及农村服务范围大的小型地区综合医院的医疗覆盖情况。风险评估和转诊决策被视为有效农村实践的核心,并且这些受到农村环境的影响。工作人员自我报告的能力和信心因程序而异,但指出服务变革似乎在他们准备好之前就已开始。自我报告的产科急诊管理能力出奇地高,但需说明的是在本研究中未对其进行独立评估。能够使用视频会议技术的工作人员报告实际使用率较低,尽管他们对其潜在用途充满热情。
在人员配置模式以及维持产科护理团队技能和能力的培训方面仍存在相当多的不确定性。需要进一步研究以测试这将如何影响农村社区的安全性、适宜性、可及性和可接受性。