Suppr超能文献

对转送至一家经认证的地区烧伤中心的烧伤患者在急诊科进行液体复苏的回顾。

A review of emergency department fluid resuscitation of burn patients transferred to a regional, verified burn center.

作者信息

Hagstrom Mats, Wirth Garrett A, Evans Gregory R D, Ikeda Clyde J

机构信息

University of California Irvine Medical Center Burn Center, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Aug;51(2):173-6. doi: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000058494.24203.99.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the adequacy of burn patient fluid resuscitation in relationship to the American Burn Association formula before arrival at a regional burn center. Further substratification of the data was undertaken to compare total burn surface area and fluid volume resuscitation as evaluated from the primary hospital's emergency department staff vs. the burn intensive care unit staff. The charts of all patients admitted to the burn center during 1 year were reviewed retrospectively. Data were compiled to calculate the time of injury, time of arrival in the referring emergency room, time in transit to the burn unit, and time of arrival in the burn unit. The total number of patients evaluated in the study was 41. Patients who were not referred from outside hospitals or who had incomplete charts were excluded. The average time from initial burn to transfer to the burn intensive care unit was 6.26 hours (range, 0.5-96 hours). The average total body surface area (TBSA) evaluated by the referring emergency department staff was 23.9% (range, 5-70%) compared with the burn intensive care unit staff evaluation average of 17.8% (range, 2-55%). Using the referring emergency department staff TBSA percentage, evaluation of the data revealed that only 23% of patients fell within the accepted range using the American Burn Association formula. Furthermore, 30% of patients were overresuscitated whereas 47% were underresuscitated. Of the overresuscitated patients, 1 patient was critically overresuscitated. In the group of underresuscitated patients, five were critically underresuscitated. Thirty-three percent of the patients' TBSA had a more than 50% discrepancy between the burn unit and the emergency department calculations. The authors conclude that better educating providers referring patients to regional burn centers can make a marked improvement in the overall care of burn patients. More important, early communication with the referring burn staff has been encouraged. Early communication permits review of estimated TBSA burn evaluations and permits cooperative calculations and optimal delivery of early fluid resuscitation. Burn center practitioners can improve care of patients before arrival by appropriately guiding the referring physician.

摘要

本研究的目的是在患者抵达区域烧伤中心之前,依据美国烧伤协会公式,检查烧伤患者液体复苏的充分性。对数据进行了进一步分层,以比较从初级医院急诊科工作人员与烧伤重症监护病房工作人员评估得出的烧伤总面积和液体复苏量。回顾性分析了烧伤中心1年内收治的所有患者的病历。汇总数据以计算受伤时间、抵达转诊急诊室的时间、转送至烧伤病房途中的时间以及抵达烧伤病房的时间。本研究评估的患者总数为41例。未从外部医院转诊或病历不完整的患者被排除。从初次烧伤到转至烧伤重症监护病房的平均时间为6.26小时(范围为0.5 - 96小时)。转诊急诊科工作人员评估的平均总体表面积(TBSA)为23.9%(范围为5 - 70%),而烧伤重症监护病房工作人员评估的平均值为17.8%(范围为2 - 55%)。根据转诊急诊科工作人员的TBSA百分比对数据进行评估发现,使用美国烧伤协会公式时,只有23%的患者处于可接受范围内。此外,30%的患者复苏过度,而47%的患者复苏不足。在复苏过度的患者中,有1例严重复苏过度。在复苏不足的患者组中,有5例严重复苏不足。33%的患者TBSA在烧伤病房和急诊科的计算结果之间存在超过50%的差异。作者得出结论,更好地培训将患者转诊至区域烧伤中心的医护人员,可显著改善烧伤患者的整体护理。更重要的是,鼓励与转诊的烧伤医护人员尽早沟通。尽早沟通可对估计的TBSA烧伤评估进行审查,并允许进行协作计算以及优化早期液体复苏的实施。烧伤中心的从业者可通过适当地指导转诊医生,改善患者在抵达前的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验