Young Steven A, Sfakianakis George N, Pyrsopoulos Nikolaos, Nishida Seigo
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Miami;Jackson Memorial Medical Center, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Clin Nucl Med. 2003 Aug;28(8):638-42. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000079386.99870.3f.
Hepatobiliary scintigraphy is commonly performed on liver transplant patients to exclude biliary complications such as obstruction or leak. Biliary reconstruction in these patients is performed using either a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis (choledochocholedochostomy) or a biliary-enteric anastomosis (Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy). The authors have observed a finding in scans performed on the latter group of patients that often simulates a bile leak. They postulate this finding to represent retention of activity in the blind end of the Roux limb (the "blind end sign"). The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics of this blind end activity, which may help differentiate it from true bile leaks.
Two nuclear medicine physicians reviewed 36 Tc-99m mebrofenin hepatobiliary scans (31 patients). Biliary reconstruction was performed in 25 patients with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, and in 6 patients with a choledochocholedochostomy. Each scan was evaluated regarding whether there was focal, persistent retention of activity in the anastomotic region, and, if so, various features of the activity were noted. Activity was concluded to represent a true bile leak based on subsequent surgical confirmation, and if there was no such confirmation, the activity was concluded to represent blind end retention in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies.
There were 8 total examples of blind end activity and 3 examples of bile leak activity. Useful discriminators between the 2 types of activity included the following: fluctuation in size and/or intensity with time (8 of 8 blind end cases vs. 0 of 3 bile leak cases); size comparable with bowel (8 of 8 vs. 1 of 3); tubular (4 of 8 vs. 0 of 3), round (4 of 8 vs. 1 of 3), or irregular (0 of 8 vs. 2 of 3) shape; and movement into bowel (3 of 8 vs. 0 of 3). Delayed imaging was performed in 3 cases at 1.5 hours, but was only conclusive in 1 case in which diffuse extravasation was seen consistent with bile leak.
Retention of activity in the blind end of the Roux limb in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies may simulate bile leak, but certain typical features, as well as delayed imaging, may aid in distinguishing the two.
肝移植患者通常会进行肝胆闪烁扫描,以排除诸如梗阻或渗漏等胆道并发症。这些患者的胆道重建可采用直接胆管对胆管吻合术(胆总管对端吻合术)或胆肠吻合术(Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术)。作者在对后一组患者进行的扫描中观察到一种常模拟胆汁渗漏的表现。他们推测这一表现代表Roux袢盲端的放射性滞留(“盲端征”)。本研究的目的是确定这种盲端放射性的特征,这可能有助于将其与真正的胆汁渗漏区分开来。
两位核医学医师回顾了36例99mTc-美罗酸盐肝胆扫描(31例患者)。25例患者采用Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术进行胆道重建,6例患者采用胆总管对端吻合术。对每次扫描评估吻合区域是否存在局灶性、持续性放射性滞留,若存在,则记录该放射性的各种特征。根据后续手术确认,若放射性被判定代表真正的胆汁渗漏,而若无此类确认,则在Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术患者中,该放射性被判定代表盲端滞留。
共有8例盲端放射性表现和3例胆汁渗漏放射性表现。两种类型放射性之间有用的确证因素如下:大小和/或强度随时间波动(8例盲端病例中的8例 vs. 3例胆汁渗漏病例中的0例);大小与肠管相当(8例中的例8 vs. 3例中的1例);管状(8例中的4例 vs. 3例中的0例)、圆形(8例中的4例 vs. 3例中的1例)或不规则形状(8例中的0例 vs. 3例中的2例);以及向肠管内移动(8例中的3例 vs. 3例中的0例)。3例患者在1.5小时进行了延迟显像,但仅1例有决定性意义,可见弥漫性外渗,符合胆汁渗漏表现。
Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术患者Roux袢盲端的放射性滞留可能模拟胆汁渗漏,但某些典型特征以及延迟显像可能有助于区分两者。