Rathert P
Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Urologische Onkologie, Klinikum Düren gGmbH.
Urologe A. 2003 Jul;42(7):908-11. doi: 10.1007/s00120-003-0311-x. Epub 2003 Mar 26.
Is urinary cytology still a useful method in cases of bladder cancer since additional methods (fluorescence image analysis, monoclonal antibody immunocytology, fibrin degradation products, nuclear matrix protein measurement and others) are under investigation? The literature has been reviewed and compared with classical and new cytology statistics: urinary cytology is less useful than cystoscopy and some of the urine bound tests for the diagnosis of low grade tumors. On the other hand, cytology is extremely valuable for the diagnosis of high grade transitional cell cancers (TCC) and especially carcinomas in situ. The presence of high-grade TCC in the cytology specimen from a patient with low grade papillary TCC suggests either an unrecognised carcinoma in situ or high grade disease in the upper urinary tract or urethra. Urinary cytology is still indispensable in the management of patients with transitional cancer.
鉴于其他方法(荧光图像分析、单克隆抗体免疫细胞学、纤维蛋白降解产物、核基质蛋白测量等)正在研究中,尿细胞学在膀胱癌病例中是否仍然是一种有用的方法?本文回顾了相关文献,并与经典和新的细胞学统计数据进行了比较:尿细胞学在诊断低级别肿瘤方面不如膀胱镜检查和一些尿液相关检测有用。另一方面,细胞学对于诊断高级别移行细胞癌(TCC)尤其是原位癌极具价值。低级别乳头状TCC患者的细胞学标本中出现高级别TCC提示存在未被识别的原位癌或上尿路或尿道的高级别疾病。尿细胞学在移行性癌患者的管理中仍然不可或缺。