Suppr超能文献

室管膜瘤中上皮膜抗原染色模式的敏感性和特异性

Sensitivity and specificity of epithelial membrane antigen staining patterns in ependymomas.

作者信息

Hasselblatt Martin, Paulus Werner

机构信息

Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Domagkstr 19, 48129 Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Neuropathol. 2003 Oct;106(4):385-8. doi: 10.1007/s00401-003-0752-8. Epub 2003 Jul 24.

Abstract

Pattern and extent of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunoreactivity in ependymomas as compared to other glial tumors have only been investigated in small series. To determine sensitivity and specificity of EMA staining, 54 ependymomas were evaluated in comparison to 54 glioblastomas, 43 fibrillary astrocytomas and 21 oligodendrogliomas. Distinct punctate intracytoplasmic EMA immunoreactivity was observed in 48/54 ependymomas (89%), whereas ring-like EMA staining was observed in 17/54 ependymomas (31%). Apart from the absence in most myxopapillary ependymomas, neither staining pattern was related to tumor grade or localization. Dot-like EMA immunoreactivity was less frequently observed in glioblastomas [32/54 (59%), P<0.05 vs ependymomas], fibrillary astrocytomas [10/43 (23%), P<0.001 vs ependymomas] and oligodendrogliomas [2/21 (10%), P<0.001 vs ependymomas], whereas ring-like EMA staining was absent. Sensitivity and specificity of punctate EMA staining for the diagnosis of ependymoma as compared to other glial tumors were determined: A finding of 5 EMA dots/high-power field was associated with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 81%. The presence of ring-like EMA positive structures was less sensitive (32%), but highly specific (100%). To conclude, distinct punctate and ring-like EMA staining might serve as sensitive and specific markers of ependymal differentiation in glial tumors and, thus, may aid the diagnosis of ependymoma.

摘要

与其他神经胶质瘤相比,室管膜瘤上皮膜抗原(EMA)免疫反应性的模式和范围仅在小样本系列中进行过研究。为了确定EMA染色的敏感性和特异性,对54例室管膜瘤与54例胶质母细胞瘤、43例纤维型星形细胞瘤和21例少突胶质细胞瘤进行了评估。在54例室管膜瘤中有48例(89%)观察到明显的点状胞质内EMA免疫反应性,而在54例室管膜瘤中有17例(31%)观察到环状EMA染色。除了大多数黏液乳头型室管膜瘤中没有外,这两种染色模式均与肿瘤分级或定位无关。在胶质母细胞瘤[32/54(59%),与室管膜瘤相比P<0.05]、纤维型星形细胞瘤[10/43(23%),与室管膜瘤相比P<0.001]和少突胶质细胞瘤[2/21(10%),与室管膜瘤相比P<0.001]中较少观察到点状EMA免疫反应性,而环状EMA染色则不存在。确定了与其他神经胶质瘤相比,点状EMA染色诊断室管膜瘤的敏感性和特异性:每高倍视野发现5个EMA点,敏感性为72%,特异性为81%。环状EMA阳性结构的存在敏感性较低(32%),但特异性较高(100%)。总之,明显的点状和环状EMA染色可能作为神经胶质瘤室管膜分化的敏感和特异性标志物,因此可能有助于室管膜瘤的诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验