Suppr超能文献

足板蛋白是室管膜瘤诊断的潜在标志物:与上皮膜抗原(EMA)的比较研究

Podoplanin is a potential marker for the diagnosis of ependymoma: a comparative study with epithelial membrane antigen (EMA).

作者信息

Ishizawa K, Komori T, Shimada S, Hirose T

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Neuropathol. 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):373-8.

Abstract

Podoplanin is a mucin-type transmembrane sialoglycoprotein that is characteristically expressed in lymphatic endothelia. It is also expressed in the ependyma of the central nervous system as well as in ependymomas. Particularly, membrane-bound structures along the luminal surface, ring-like structures, and dot-like structures in the cytoplasm, all of which were originally reported for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunohistochemistry in ependymoma, were also reported for podoplanin immunohistochemistry in ependymoma. This study was undertaken to evaluate podoplanin as compared with EMA as a marker of ependymoma. A total of 16 ependymomas (WHO Grade (G) II, 9 cases; GIII, 4; myxopapillary, 2; GIII clear cell, (1) were immunohistochemically studied using antibodies against podoplanin (clones D2-40 and NZ-1) as well as an antibody against EMA (clone E29). In all cases, D2-40 and NZ-1 excellently labeled linear signals along the luminal surface of ependymal canals/rosettes, dot-like structures, and/or ringlike structures, as did E29. These structures were generally more abundant in GII ependymomas than in GIII ependymomas. A semiquantitative analysis between the immunopositive structures of D2-40 or NZ-1 and E29 was conducted with a focus on the dot-like structures and the ring-like structures in the cases of GII and GIII ependymoma. The result showed that there was no statistical difference between D2-40 or NZ-1 and E29. Our study suggests that podoplanin is a potential marker for the diagnosis of ependymoma that corresponds to EMA. Anti-podoplanin antibodies and anti-EMA antibodies could cooperate with each other for the diagnostic immunohistochemistry of ependymoma.

摘要

血小板源性生长因子结合蛋白是一种粘蛋白型跨膜唾液酸糖蛋白,其特征性地表达于淋巴管内皮细胞。它也表达于中枢神经系统的室管膜以及室管膜瘤中。特别地,室管膜瘤中沿管腔表面的膜结合结构、环状结构和细胞质中的点状结构,最初是在上皮膜抗原(EMA)免疫组化中报道的,在血小板源性生长因子结合蛋白免疫组化中也有报道。本研究旨在评估血小板源性生长因子结合蛋白与EMA作为室管膜瘤标志物的比较。总共16例室管膜瘤(世界卫生组织(WHO)II级,9例;III级,4例;黏液乳头型,2例;III级透明细胞型,1例)使用抗血小板源性生长因子结合蛋白抗体(克隆D2 - 40和NZ - 1)以及抗EMA抗体(克隆E29)进行免疫组化研究。在所有病例中,D2 - 40和NZ - 1与E29一样,出色地标记了室管膜管/玫瑰花结的管腔表面、点状结构和/或环状结构的线性信号。这些结构在II级室管膜瘤中通常比III级室管膜瘤中更丰富。对II级和III级室管膜瘤病例中的点状结构和环状结构,重点进行了D2 - 40或NZ - 1与E29免疫阳性结构之间的半定量分析。结果显示,D2 - 40或NZ - 1与E29之间无统计学差异。我们的研究表明,血小板源性生长因子结合蛋白是一种与EMA相当的室管膜瘤诊断潜在标志物。抗血小板源性生长因子结合蛋白抗体和抗EMA抗体可相互配合用于室管膜瘤的诊断性免疫组化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验