Devlin Michael J, Goldfein Juli A, Dobrow Ilyse
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2003;34 Suppl:S2-18. doi: 10.1002/eat.10201.
Although binge eating has been recognized as a clinically relevant behavior among the obese for more than four decades, the concept of binge eating disorder (BED) as a distinct psychiatric diagnosis is of much more recent origin. This article presents four ways of conceptualizing BED: a distinct disorder in its own right, as a variant of bulimia nervosa, as a useful behavioral subtype of obesity, and as a behavior that reflects psychopathology among the obese. It also summarizes the evidence supporting and disconfirming each model.
The literature subsequent to the development of DSM-IV regarding the reliability and validity of BED and related conditions was reviewed selectively.
The preponderance of the evidence suggests that BED differs importantly from purging bulimia nervosa and that BED is not a strikingly useful behavioral subtype of obesity.
Further study is needed to definitively determine the validity of BED as a distinct eating disorder.
尽管暴饮暴食在肥胖人群中被视为一种具有临床相关性的行为已有四十多年,但暴食症(BED)作为一种独特的精神疾病诊断概念却是最近才出现的。本文介绍了四种将暴食症概念化的方式:一种独立的独特疾病、神经性贪食症的一种变体、肥胖的一种有用行为亚型,以及一种反映肥胖人群精神病理学的行为。文章还总结了支持和反驳每种模型的证据。
有选择地回顾了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)发布后关于暴食症及相关情况的可靠性和有效性的文献。
大量证据表明,暴食症与清除型神经性贪食症有重要区别,且暴食症并非肥胖的一种特别有用的行为亚型。
需要进一步研究以明确确定暴食症作为一种独特饮食失调症的有效性。