Tanzi Mario, Gardner Melinda, Megellas Michelle, Lucio Steven, Restino Maryann
Pharmacy Clinical Solutions, Novation, Irving, TX, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Jul 1;60(13):1330-5. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.13.1330.
The appropriateness of albumin use and baseline albumin usage patterns were studied. Institutional practice patterns regarding the use of albumin were compared to criteria established by an independent expert panel. Fifty-three institutions, all of which were members of VHA or the University Health-System Consortium, participated in the evaluation. Investigators collected data over an eight-week period from the medical records, pharmacy records, and hospital billing data of adult (18 years of age or older) and pediatric (age 1-17 years) patients for whom albumin was prescribed. Data collected included patient-specific information, the prescribing physician's specialty area, patient location (level of care) when albumin was prescribed, primary reasons for prescribing albumin, and details of albumin use. Data were collected for 1649 adult and 23 pediatric patients. Albumin was prescribed inappropriately in 57.8% and appropriately in 28.2% of adults; appropriateness of use was unknown in 14% of the patients reviewed. The most common indication for albumin use was hypotension/hypovolemia (23.9%), followed by bypass-pump priming (16.3%), intradialytic blood pressure support (9.6%), and serum albumin values less than 2 g/dL (8.6%). Albumin was prescribed inappropriately 100% of the time when used for intradialytic blood pressure support, low serum albumin values, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The most appropriate use of albumin occurred in patients with postsurgical hypotension and hypovolemia (67.8%), nephrotic syndrome (79.3%), non-hemorrhagic shock (44.3%), hemorrhagic shock (51.9%), and cirrhosis and paracentesis (31.3%). Albumin was inappropriately prescribed for 57.8% of adult patients and 52.2% of pediatric patients. The mean number of total grams used by patients receiving albumin appropriately was similar to those patients inappropriately receiving albumin.
研究了白蛋白使用的合理性以及基线白蛋白使用模式。将各机构关于白蛋白使用的实际模式与一个独立专家小组制定的标准进行了比较。五十三家机构参与了评估,所有这些机构均为退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)或大学卫生系统联合会的成员。研究人员在八周时间内从成年(18岁及以上)和儿科(1 - 17岁)患者的病历、药房记录及医院计费数据中收集数据,这些患者均被开具了白蛋白处方。收集的数据包括患者特定信息、开处方医生的专业领域、开具白蛋白时患者的位置(护理级别)、开具白蛋白的主要原因以及白蛋白使用的详细情况。共收集了1649名成年患者和23名儿科患者的数据。在成年患者中,57.8%的白蛋白处方开具不当,28.2%开具得当;在接受审查的患者中,14%的使用合理性未知。白蛋白使用最常见的指征是低血压/血容量不足(23.9%),其次是体外循环泵预充(16.3%)、透析期间血压支持(9.6%)以及血清白蛋白值低于2 g/dL(8.6%)。当白蛋白用于透析期间血压支持、低血清白蛋白值和急性呼吸窘迫综合征时,100%的处方开具不当。白蛋白使用最恰当的情况发生在术后低血压和血容量不足的患者(67.8%)、肾病综合征患者(79.3%)、非出血性休克患者(44.3%)、出血性休克患者(51.9%)以及肝硬化和腹腔穿刺患者(31.3%)中。成年患者中有57.8%、儿科患者中有52.2%的白蛋白处方开具不当。接受合适剂量白蛋白的患者使用的总克数平均值与接受不当剂量白蛋白的患者相似。