Dell'Eva Raffaella, Pfeffer Ulrich, Indraccolo S, Albini Adriana, Noonan Douglas
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy.
Endothelium. 2002;9(1):3-10. doi: 10.1080/10623320210712.
Tumor growth, local invasion, and metastatic dissemination are dependent on the formation of new microvessels. The process of angiogenesis is regulated by a balance between pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors, and the shift to an angiogenic phenotype (the "angiogenic switch") is a key event in tumor progression. The use of anti-angiogenic agents to restore this balance represents a promising approach to cancer treatment. Known physiological inhibitors include trombospondin, several interleukins, and the proteolytic break-down products of several proteins. Angiostatin, an internal fragment of plasminogen, is one of the more potent of this latter class of angiogenesis inhibitors. Like endostatin, another anti-angiogenic peptide derived from collagen XVIII, angiostatin can induce tumor vasculature regression, leading to a complete cessation of tumor growth. Inhibitors of angiogenesis target normal endothelial cells, therefore the development of resistance to these drugs is unlikely. The efficacy of angiostatin has been demonstrated in animal models for many different types of solid tumors. Anti-angiogenic cancer therapy with angiostatin requires prolonged administration of the peptide. The production of the functional polypeptides is expensive and technical problems related to physical properties and purity are frequently encountered. Gene transfer represents an alternative method to deliver angiostatin. Gene therapy has the potential to produce the therapeutic agent in high concentrations in a local area for a sustained period, thereby avoiding the problems encountered with long-term administration of recombinant proteins, monoclonal antibodies, or anti-angiogenic drugs. In this review we compare the different gene therapy strategies that have been applied to angiostatin, with special regard to their ability to provide sufficient angiostatin at the target site.
肿瘤生长、局部侵袭和转移扩散依赖于新微血管的形成。血管生成过程由促血管生成因子和抗血管生成因子之间的平衡所调节,向血管生成表型的转变(“血管生成开关”)是肿瘤进展中的关键事件。使用抗血管生成药物来恢复这种平衡是一种有前景的癌症治疗方法。已知的生理抑制剂包括血小板反应蛋白、几种白细胞介素以及几种蛋白质的蛋白水解降解产物。血管抑素是纤溶酶原的一个内部片段,是后一类血管生成抑制剂中效力较强的一种。与内皮抑素类似,内皮抑素是另一种源自胶原蛋白 XVIII 的抗血管生成肽,血管抑素可诱导肿瘤血管退化,导致肿瘤生长完全停止。血管生成抑制剂靶向正常内皮细胞,因此不太可能产生对这些药物的耐药性。血管抑素的疗效已在多种不同类型实体瘤的动物模型中得到证实。用血管抑素进行抗血管生成癌症治疗需要长期给予该肽。功能性多肽的生产成本高昂,并且经常遇到与物理性质和纯度相关的技术问题。基因转移是递送血管抑素的另一种方法。基因治疗有可能在局部区域持续高浓度产生治疗剂,从而避免长期施用重组蛋白、单克隆抗体或抗血管生成药物时遇到的问题。在本综述中,我们比较了已应用于血管抑素的不同基因治疗策略,特别关注它们在靶位点提供足够血管抑素的能力。