Suppr超能文献

双向格林手术和全腔静脉肺动脉连接术中的心室力学

Ventricular mechanics in the bidirectional glenn procedure and total cavopulmonary connection.

作者信息

Tanoue Yoshihisa, Sese Akira, Imoto Yutaka, Joh Kunitaka

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Pediatric Cardiology, Kyushu Kosei-Nenkin Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Aug;76(2):562-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00467-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The time course of ventricular efficiency in Fontan candidates who underwent both the bidirectional Glenn procedure (BDG) and total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) were analyzed in this study. We previously reported that volume-load reduction of BDG preceding TCPC allowed for any afterload mismatch to be corrected, thereby improving ventricular efficiency after staged TCPC.

METHODS

We measured percent normal systemic ventricular end-diastolic volume (%N-EDV), contractility (end-systolic elastance [Ees]), afterload (effective arterial elastance [Ea]), and ventricular efficiency (ventriculoarterial coupling [Ea/Ees]) based on cardiac catheterization data before and after both BDG and staged TCPC in 30 patients. Ees and Ea were approximated as follows: Ees = mean arterial pressure/minimal ventricular volume, and Ea = maximal ventricular pressure/(maximal ventricular volume - minimal ventricular volume), and Ea/Ees was then calculated. Ventricular volume was divided by body surface area.

RESULTS

The %N-EDV decreased both after BDG and after staged TCPC, thus resulting in an improvement of Ees. Although Ea increased both after BDG and after staged TCPC, Ea decreased during the interval between BDG and staged TCPC. These changes resulted in an improvement in Ea/Ees during the interval period and after staged TCPC, although Ea/Ees worsened after BDG.

CONCLUSIONS

Correction of afterload mismatch during the interval period between BDG and staged TCPC is considered to be one of the most important factors for obtaining excellent clinical results when selecting a staged strategy to treat high-risk Fontan candidates.

摘要

背景

本研究分析了接受双向格林手术(BDG)和全腔静脉肺动脉连接术(TCPC)的Fontan手术候选者的心室效率随时间的变化过程。我们之前报道过,在TCPC之前进行BDG以减轻容量负荷,可纠正任何后负荷不匹配,从而改善分期TCPC后的心室效率。

方法

我们根据30例患者在BDG和分期TCPC前后的心脏导管检查数据,测量了正常体循环心室舒张末期容积百分比(%N-EDV)、收缩性(收缩末期弹性[Ees])、后负荷(有效动脉弹性[Ea])和心室效率(心室动脉耦合[Ea/Ees])。Ees和Ea按以下方式近似计算:Ees = 平均动脉压/最小心室容积,Ea = 最大心室压力/(最大心室容积 - 最小心室容积),然后计算Ea/Ees。心室容积除以体表面积。

结果

BDG后和分期TCPC后%N-EDV均降低,从而导致Ees改善。虽然BDG后和分期TCPC后Ea均升高,但在BDG和分期TCPC之间的间隔期Ea降低。这些变化导致在间隔期和分期TCPC后Ea/Ees改善,尽管BDG后Ea/Ees恶化。

结论

在选择分期策略治疗高危Fontan手术候选者时,在BDG和分期TCPC之间的间隔期纠正后负荷不匹配被认为是获得优异临床结果的最重要因素之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验