Suppr超能文献

双向格林手术继以全腔静脉肺动脉连接术还是一期全腔静脉肺动脉连接术?

Bidirectional Glenn followed by total cavopulmonary connection or primary total cavopulmonary connection?

作者信息

Kostelka M, Hucín B, Tláskal T, Chaloupecký V, Reich O, Janousek J, Marek J, Skovránek J

机构信息

Kardiocentrum, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Aug;12(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(97)00150-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of mortality and morbidity of patients treated by primary total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC)-Primary correction group, and comparison to patients treated by bidirectional Glenn (BDG) followed by total cavopulmonary connection-two stage TCPC group.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 123 consecutive patients who underwent 144 different types of cavopulmonary connections between 1987-1995: bidirectional Glenn 59, HemiFontan operation 10, primary total cavopulmonary connection 54, and total cavopulmonary connection completion after previous bidirectional Glenn 21. Important preoperative risk factors: age, systemic outflow obstruction, pulmonary venous obstruction, pulmonary artery (PA) hypoplasia (McGoon ratio), PA stenosis/distortion, PA mean pressure, PA vascular resistance, atrioventricular valve regurgitation, systolic and diastolic ventricular function and ventricular hypertrophy were re-evaluated according to Texas Heart Institution Scoring System in both groups. Three different preoperative risk groups were established: low risk, score (0-3) moderate risk (4,5) and high risk score (> or = 6).

RESULTS

Mean age was 85.2 month (range 16.1-229.5 months) and 106.6 months (range 42.6-178.9 months) in primary correction group and two stage TCPC group, respectively. Diagnosis was similar in both groups, majority having univentricular heart or hypoplastic one ventricle. Initial palliation (pulmonary artery banding, modified aortopulmonary shunt, coarctation repair etc.) was performed in 38 (70.3%) patients of primary correction group and in 12 (57.1%) two stage TCPC group. The mortality was 7.4% (4 out of 54) and 14.2% (3 out of 21) for primary correction and two stage TCPC group, respectively. There were two take down in the primary correction group. There was no late death in either group. Operative data and postoperative morbidity did not statistically differ in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Until 1993 bidirectional Glenn was preferred to primary total cavopulmonary connection for high risk patients. High mortality 14.2% patients of two stage TCPC group vs. 7.4% of primary correction group in patients with the same preoperative hazard led us to change our policy. We now prefer primary TCPC for all patients with functional single ventricle and surgically correctable major associated defects. High risk patients undergo TCPC with fenestration. Patients not suitable for TCPC undergo either HemiFontan operation or some type of initial palliative procedure.

摘要

目的

分析接受一期全腔静脉肺动脉连接术(TCPC)-一期矫治组治疗的患者的死亡率和发病率,并与接受双向格林分流术(BDG)后再行全腔静脉肺动脉连接术的二期TCPC组患者进行比较。

方法

对1987年至1995年间连续接受144种不同类型腔静脉肺动脉连接术的123例患者进行回顾性研究:双向格林分流术59例,半Fontan手术10例,一期全腔静脉肺动脉连接术54例,以及先前接受双向格林分流术后行全腔静脉肺动脉连接术完成术21例。根据德克萨斯心脏研究所评分系统,对两组患者术前的重要危险因素进行重新评估:年龄、体循环流出道梗阻、肺静脉梗阻、肺动脉(PA)发育不全(McGoon比值)、PA狭窄/扭曲、PA平均压、PA血管阻力、房室瓣反流、收缩期和舒张期心室功能以及心室肥厚。建立了三种不同的术前风险组:低风险,评分(0 - 3);中度风险(4,5);高风险评分(≥6)。

结果

一期矫治组和二期TCPC组的平均年龄分别为85.2个月(范围16.1 - 229.5个月)和106.6个月(范围42.6 - 178.9个月)。两组诊断相似,大多数患者患有单心室或发育不全的单心室。一期矫治组38例(70.3%)患者和二期TCPC组12例(57.1%)患者进行了初始姑息治疗(肺动脉环扎术、改良体肺分流术、缩窄修复术等)。一期矫治组和二期TCPC组的死亡率分别为7.4%(54例中有4例)和14.2%(21例中有3例)。一期矫治组有2例拆除手术。两组均无晚期死亡。两组的手术数据和术后发病率在统计学上无差异。

结论

直到1993年,对于高风险患者,双向格林分流术比一期全腔静脉肺动脉连接术更受青睐。在术前风险相同的患者中,二期TCPC组的高死亡率为14.2%,而一期矫治组为7.4%,这促使我们改变了策略。我们现在更倾向于对所有功能性单心室且有手术可矫正的主要相关缺陷的患者采用一期TCPC。高风险患者行带开窗的TCPC。不适合行TCPC的患者行半Fontan手术或某种类型的初始姑息手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验