Rilling William S, Dicker Matthew
Section of Vascular/Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jun;6(2):76-81. doi: 10.1053/tvir.2003.36448.
Closure devices can generally be categorized by their mechanism of obtaining hemostasis. Currently, devices are either suture-based, collagen-based, or utilize a combination of technologies. They can also be classified on the basis of whether or not they have an intravascular component or exclusively extra-vascular components. The devices that are currently available differ markedly in their mechanism of action, deployment, advantages, and disadvantages. In this article, we will review in detail the Angio-Seal closure device, review some of the current literature regarding this device, and assess its complications, advantages, and disadvantages.
闭合装置通常可根据其实现止血的机制进行分类。目前，装置要么基于缝线，要么基于胶原蛋白，或者采用多种技术的组合。它们也可根据是否具有血管内组件或仅具有血管外组件进行分类。目前可用的装置在其作用机制、部署方式、优点和缺点方面存在显著差异。在本文中，我们将详细回顾血管封堵闭合装置，回顾一些关于该装置的当前文献，并评估其并发症、优点和缺点。
