Halloran J, Gunn J, Young D
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Nov;32(4):301-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1992.tb02838.x.
Shared obstetric care between hospital and general practitioner (GP) is being developed in several States in Australia as an alternative model of care for pregnant women in the public hospital system. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of participating GPs to the shared obstetric care programme at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne. Fifty GPs were randomly selected, and face to face individual interviews were conducted using qualitative methods. GPs feel that the continuity of care they can provide during pregnancy and the postpartum is a very important and valuable aspect of their role as shared care providers. They are generally satisfied with the programme at the Royal Women's Hospital but some suggest that communication between the hospital and the GP should be improved. There was significant interest in being involved in deliveries in shared care programmes in the future and GPs question the appropriateness of the diploma of obstetrics as the only acceptable qualification for shared care.
澳大利亚多个州正在发展医院与全科医生(GP)之间的共享产科护理模式,作为公立医院系统中为孕妇提供护理的一种替代模式。本研究的目的是确定参与研究的全科医生对墨尔本皇家妇女医院共享产科护理项目的态度。随机选择了50名全科医生,并采用定性方法进行面对面的个人访谈。全科医生认为,他们在孕期和产后能够提供的连续性护理,是其作为共享护理提供者角色中非常重要且有价值的一个方面。他们总体上对皇家妇女医院的项目感到满意,但一些人建议应改善医院与全科医生之间的沟通。未来参与共享护理项目接生工作的兴趣浓厚,并且全科医生对将产科文凭作为共享护理唯一可接受资格的适当性提出质疑。