文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review.

作者信息

Hawley Glenda, Janamian Tina, Jackson Claire, Wilkinson Shelley A

机构信息

APHCRI Centre of Research Excellence in Primary Health Care Microsystems, School of Medicine, Discipline of General Practice, University of Queensland, Herston 4029, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 30;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-52.


DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-14-52
PMID:24475912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3912922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been widely used as a tool to facilitate communication between health care providers and a pregnant woman. Since its inception in the 1950s, it has been described as a successful initiative, evolving to meet the needs of communities and their providers. Increasingly, the electronic health record (EHR) has dominated the healthcare arena and the maternity general practice shared-care arrangement seems to have adopted this initiative. A systematic review was conducted to determine perspectives of the PHR and the EHR with regards to data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers. METHOD: A literature search was conducted that included papers from 1985 to 2012. Studies were chosen if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria, reporting on: data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers. Papers were extracted by one reviewer in consultation with two reviewers with expertise in maternity e-health and independently assessed for quality. RESULTS: A total of 43 papers were identified for the review, from an initial 6,816 potentially relevant publications. No papers were found that reported on data completeness in a maternity PHR or a maternity EHR, in a shared-care setting. Women described the PHR as important to their antenatal care and had a generally positive perception of using an EHR. Hospital clinicians reported generally positive experiences using a PHR, while both positive and negative impressions were found using an EHR. The few papers describing the use of the PHR and EHR by community clinicians were also divergent and inconclusive with regards to their experiences. In a general practice shared-care model, the PHR is a valuable tool for integration between the woman and the health care provider. While the EHR is an ideal initiative in the maternity setting, facilitating referrals and communication, there are issues of fragmentation and continued paper use. CONCLUSIONS: There was a surprising gap in knowledge surrounding data completeness on maternity PHRs or EHRs. There is also a paucity of available impressions from community clinicians using both forms of the records.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/3912922/0e0ccf6a199b/1471-2393-14-52-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/3912922/0e0ccf6a199b/1471-2393-14-52-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/3912922/0e0ccf6a199b/1471-2393-14-52-1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014-1-30

[2]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[3]
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Epidemiol Prev. 2013

[4]
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-2

[5]
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21

[6]
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[7]
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training

2025-1

[8]
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.

Med Teach. 2009-4

[9]
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[10]
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-7-27

引用本文的文献

[1]
Why Do Individuals with Diabetes Miss Their Dietitian Appointments? A Mixed-Methods Study on Barriers and Strategies for Improved Engagement in Diabetes Care.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-6-12

[2]
The practicalities of adapting UK maternity clinical information systems for observational research: Experiences of the POOL study.

Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023

[3]
Care coordination across healthcare systems: development of a research agenda, implications for practice, and recommendations for policy based on a modified Delphi panel.

BMJ Open. 2023-5-17

[4]
Patients', carers' and healthcare providers' views of patient-held health records in Kerala, India: A qualitative exploratory study.

Health Expect. 2023-6

[5]
A systematic review of home-based records in maternal and child health for improving informational continuity, health outcomes, and perceived usefulness in low and middle-income countries.

PLoS One. 2022

[6]
Systematic review on the use of patient-held health records in low-income and middle-income countries.

BMJ Open. 2021-9-2

[7]
Facilitating better postnatal care with women-held documents in The Gambia: a mixed-methods study.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021-7-2

[8]
Digital Data Sources and Their Impact on People's Health: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Front Public Health. 2021

[9]
The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia.

PLoS One. 2020-3-6

[10]
The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany.

BMJ Glob Health. 2019-8-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Perinatal data collection: current practice in the Australian nursing and midwifery healthcare context.

Health Inf Manag. 2013

[2]
Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries?

Online J Public Health Inform. 2011

[3]
An empirical investigation into beliefs about collaborative practice among maternity care providers.

Aust Health Rev. 2012-11

[4]
Use of technology in childbirth. 7. Electronic maternity records.

Pract Midwife. 2012-4

[5]
Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity information technology?

J R Soc Med. 2012-3

[6]
The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures.

J Gen Intern Med. 2011-10-18

[7]
Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?

J R Soc Med. 2011-10

[8]
Delivery of maternal health care in Indigenous primary care services: baseline data for an ongoing quality improvement initiative.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011-3-7

[9]
Defining collaboration in Australian maternity care.

Women Birth. 2011-3-5

[10]
The nature and impact of collaboration and integrated service delivery for pregnant women, children and families.

J Clin Nurs. 2010-10-14

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索