Wu Yang-feng, An Ning, Wang Xin, Shao Lan
Department of Epidemiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, CAMS, PUMC, Beijing 100037, China.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2002 Dec;24(6):577-81.
To evaluate the necessity, scientificity, and feasibility of the drafted Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension for Primary Care Physicians.
Derivative Dolphe Method was used to collect the responses from 50 experts in hypertension or related fields within the nation. An evaluation score of 1 to 5 was given to each item for selection, 1 for highly disagreed and 5 for highly agreed. The mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variance (CV) of the scores were calculated.
(1) 90% experts responded to the evaluation sheet. (2) The mean score were above 4 for the five out of the six items related to necessity, the SD varied from 0.51 to 1.05, and the CV from 0.11 to 0.30. (3) Among the 28 items related to scientificity and rationality, the mean score was above 4 for 25 items and was between 3.5 and 4 for other three items. The CV was generally lower than 0.35. (4) Among the seven items related to feasibility, the mean score for five of them was lower than 4, and the CV varied from 0.21 to 0.33.
The results indicate that the necessity and scientificity of the most content of the guidelines are confirmed by the invited experts.
评估《基层医生高血压防治实践指南（草案）》的必要性、科学性和可行性。
采用德尔菲法收集国内50名高血压或相关领域专家的意见。对每个选项给出1至5分的评分，1分为高度不同意，5分为高度同意。计算得分的均值、标准差（SD）和变异系数（CV）。
（1）90%的专家回复了评估表。（2）与必要性相关的6项内容中，5项的平均得分高于4分，标准差在0.51至1.05之间，变异系数在0.11至0.30之间。（3）在与科学性和合理性相关的28项内容中，25项的平均得分高于4分，另外3项在3.5至4分之间。变异系数普遍低于0.35。（4）在与可行性相关的7项内容中，其中5项的平均得分低于4分，变异系数在0.21至0.33之间。
结果表明，受邀专家认可该指南大部分内容的必要性和科学性。
