Dahan Rachel, Reis Shmuel, Borkan Jeffry, Brown Judith-Bell, Hermoni Doron, Mansor Nadia, Harris Stewart
Department of Family Medicine, The B. RAppaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):785-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00847.x. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
To measure knowledge of Israeli low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines among different subgroups of primary care doctors, prior to designing an intervention programme to enhance guideline adherence in practice.
Confidential mailed survey questionnaire.
Family practices in the Haifa and western Galilee district, Israel.
Random sample of 163 primary care doctors. A total of 134 doctors (82%) completed the questionnaire.
A Multiple Choice Questionnaire measuring knowledge of the LBP guidelines. Instrument reliability and inter-item reliability were tested in a pilot phase. Content validity was assured by having the Israeli LBP guideline authors involved in a consensus procedure.
Distribution of test scores significantly differentiated professional levels and background variables, demonstrating the instrument reliability. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.91. The average test score was 67.7 [standard deviation (SD) 16.2], family doctors had average scores of 75.2 (SD 9.8), general practitioners (GPs) 57.9 (SD 19) and family practice residents 67.4 (SD 13.2). The difference between the test average scores of family doctors, GPs and residents was significant (P < 0.001). Significant differences were also found for specific variables including the doctor's age, country of medical training and self-report familiarity with the LBP guidelines.
Striking differences exist between subgroups of primary care doctors regarding their knowledge of LBP guidelines. These differences will require the design of multiple interventions tailored to each subgroup.
在设计一项旨在提高实践中对指南依从性的干预计划之前,评估以色列基层医疗医生不同亚组对腰痛(LBP)临床实践指南的了解情况。
保密邮寄调查问卷。
以色列海法和西加利利地区的家庭医疗诊所。
163名基层医疗医生的随机样本。共有134名医生(82%)完成了问卷。
一份用于评估对LBP指南了解情况的多项选择题问卷。在试点阶段测试了工具的信度和项目间信度。通过让以色列LBP指南作者参与共识程序确保了内容效度。
测试分数的分布在专业水平和背景变量上有显著差异,证明了该工具的信度。克朗巴哈系数高于0.91。平均测试分数为67.7[标准差(SD)16.2],家庭医生的平均分数为75.2(SD 9.8),全科医生(GPs)为57.9(SD 19),家庭医疗住院医生为67.4(SD 13.2)。家庭医生、全科医生和住院医生的测试平均分数之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。在医生年龄、医学培训国家和自我报告的对LBP指南的熟悉程度等特定变量上也发现了显著差异。
基层医疗医生亚组之间在对LBP指南的了解方面存在显著差异。这些差异需要针对每个亚组设计多种干预措施。