• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香港慢性下背痛中国患者通用健康测量工具的心理测量特性

Psychometric properties of a generic health measure in Chinese patients with low back pain in Hong Kong.

作者信息

Leung A S L, Lam T-H, Hedley A J, Twomey L T

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hungham, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2003 Aug;8(3):151-60. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00006-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00006-7
PMID:12909435
Abstract

In Hong Kong, the measurement of perceived health status in patients with low back pain (LBP) can be facilitated by the availability of a health profile specifically designed for the Chinese culture. This prospective observational study investigated the psychometric properties of the generic Current Perceived Health 42 (CPH42) Profile in four separate samples (totalling 473) of Chinese patients with LBP in Hong Kong. The patients completed the CPH42 Profile and the Roland LBP Disability Scale at various points in the course of physiotherapy. Their pain intensity was measured using the 11-point pain numerical rating scale (NRS). The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the CPH42 Profile demonstrated high intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.92 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.90. Validity was confirmed by a moderate correlation with the Chinese adaptations of the Roland LBP Disability Scale and the NRS at the commencement of physiotherapy (Spearman's correlation coefficients were 0.48 and 0.42, respectively). The responsiveness, measured from the commencement of physiotherapy to weeks 3 and 6 (standard response means of 0.33 and 0.58, respectively), were commensurate with the respective changes in pain intensity. The psychometric properties of the CPH42 Profile suggest its suitability for use as an outcome instrument in future efficacy studies on LBP intervention.

摘要

在香港,专门为中国文化设计的健康状况档案有助于对腰痛(LBP)患者的健康状况感知进行测量。这项前瞻性观察研究在香港的四个独立样本(共473名)中国腰痛患者中调查了通用的当前健康感知42项(CPH42)档案的心理测量特性。患者在物理治疗过程中的不同时间点完成了CPH42档案和罗兰腰痛残疾量表。使用11点疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)测量他们的疼痛强度。CPH42档案的重测信度和内部一致性显示组内相关系数高达0.92,克朗巴哈系数为0.90。在物理治疗开始时,与罗兰腰痛残疾量表的中文版和NRS的中度相关性证实了其效度(斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为0.48和0.42)。从物理治疗开始到第3周和第6周测量的反应度(标准反应均值分别为0.33和0.58)与疼痛强度的相应变化相当。CPH42档案的心理测量特性表明它适合作为未来腰痛干预疗效研究的结果工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of a generic health measure in Chinese patients with low back pain in Hong Kong.香港慢性下背痛中国患者通用健康测量工具的心理测量特性
Man Ther. 2003 Aug;8(3):151-60. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00006-7.
2
Use of a subjective health measure on Chinese low back pain patients in Hong Kong.针对香港的中国下背痛患者使用主观健康测量方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 May 15;24(10):961-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00006.
3
Psychometric properties of a generic health measure in patients with neck pain.颈部疼痛患者通用健康测量工具的心理测量学特性
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Aug;19(5):505-13. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr852oa.
4
Subjective health measure used on Chinese patients with neck pain in Hong Kong.用于香港颈部疼痛中国患者的主观健康测量方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1884-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00013.
5
Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a.古吉拉特语版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数2.1a的信度和效度研究
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Sep 22;30(5):1103-1109. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169728.
6
Reliability, Construct and Predictive Validity of the Hong Kong Chinese Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.香港中文 Orebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的信度、结构和预测效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):584-592. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9689-3.
7
The development of the Dutch version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire.《Fremantle 背部感知问卷》荷兰语版的编制。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Dec;32:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain.慢性疼痛接纳问卷:意大利慢性腰痛患者的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E824-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182917299.
9
Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.巴西葡萄牙语版奥斯威斯垂残疾指数的开发:跨文化调适、信度与效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):481-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47.
10
Psychometric testing of Ibadan low back pain disability questionnaire.伊巴丹下腰痛残疾问卷的心理测量测试
Ghana Med J. 2020 Jun;54(2):110-113. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v54i2.9.