Krasnianski M, Winterholler M, Neudecker S, Zierz S
Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2003 Aug;71(8):397-405. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41192.
Historical publications of the classical alternating medulla oblongata syndromes of Wallenberg, Babinski-Nageotte, Cestan-Chenais, Hughlings Jackson, Avellis, Schmidt, Dejerine, Spiller and Tapia were reviewed and critically analysed. We compare these descriptions with descriptions of the brainstem syndromes in well-known modern German, English and Russian neurological textbooks. The anatomic basis and etiology of the alternating medullar syndromes, and the main publications relating to these syndromes were discussed. Causes of the inconsistencies of the modern and historical descriptions of these syndromes might be an ignorance of the historical references. Progress and development of the clinical neurology and neuroanatomy in the late twentieth century, however, has also lead to correction and perfection of some historical descriptions in the modern neurological literature.
对有关瓦伦贝格、巴宾斯基 - 纳若特、塞斯坦 - 谢奈、杰克逊、阿韦利斯、施密特、德热里纳、斯皮勒和塔皮亚经典延髓交替综合征的历史出版物进行了回顾和批判性分析。我们将这些描述与著名的现代德语、英语和俄语神经学教科书中脑干综合征的描述进行了比较。讨论了延髓交替综合征的解剖学基础和病因,以及与这些综合征相关的主要出版物。现代和历史对这些综合征描述不一致的原因可能是对历史参考文献的忽视。然而,20世纪后期临床神经学和神经解剖学的进展也导致现代神经学文献中对一些历史描述的修正和完善。