Kanaide Masato, Fukusaki Makoto, Tamura Shino, Takada Masafumi, Miyako Masahiko, Sumikawa Koji
Department of Anesthesia, Nagasaki Rosai Hospital, 2-12-5 Setogoshi, Sasebo 857-0134, Japan.
J Anesth. 2003;17(3):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-003-0166-8.
Tracheal intubation using a lightwand device (Trachlight) should minimize hemodynamic change by avoiding direct-vision laryngoscopy. We evaluated hemodynamic and catecholamine responses during tracheal intubation using a Trachlight in elderly patients with hypertension.
Twenty-six hypertensive patients aged over 65 years undergoing orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups, group L (n = 13) and group T (n = 13). Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (2 microg x kg(-1)) and propofol (1.5 mg x kg(-1)), and then muscle relaxation was obtained with vecuronium (0.15 mg x kg(-1)). The trachea was intubated with either a Macintosh laryngoscope (group L) or a Trachlight (group T). Hemodynamics, plasma catecholamine concentrations, and arterial blood gases were measured before the induction of anesthesia (T0), before tracheal intubation (T1), immediately after tracheal intubation (T2), and 3 min after tracheal intubation (T3).
The intubation time was shorter in group T than in group L (12.6 +/- 1.7 vs 23.5 +/- 2.9 s, mean +/- SE; P < 0.01). Compared with the preinduction (T0) value, systolic blood pressure (SBP) showed a significant decrease at T1 and T3 in group L and at T1, T2, and T3 in group T. The heart rate (HR) and plasma norepinephrine (NE) concentration showed no change in either group throughout the time course, whereas the plasma epinephrine (E) concentration showed a significant decrease at T2 and T3 in both groups. The mean values of the rate-pressure product (RPP: HR x SBP) were less than 15000 after tracheal intubation in both groups. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic or catecholamine responses between groups at any point. No patient had ischemic ST-T changes in either group.
A lightwand has no advantage over a laryngoscope in terms of hemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation in elderly patients with hypertension, despite a shorter intubation time.
使用光棒装置(Trachlight)进行气管插管应通过避免直视喉镜检查来尽量减少血流动力学变化。我们评估了在老年高血压患者中使用Trachlight进行气管插管期间的血流动力学和儿茶酚胺反应。
26例年龄超过65岁接受骨科手术的高血压患者被随机分为两组,L组(n = 13)和T组(n = 13)。用芬太尼(2μg·kg⁻¹)和丙泊酚(1.5mg·kg⁻¹)诱导麻醉,然后用维库溴铵(0.15mg·kg⁻¹)实现肌肉松弛。分别用麦金托什喉镜(L组)或Trachlight(T组)进行气管插管。在麻醉诱导前(T0)、气管插管前(T1)、气管插管后即刻(T2)和气管插管后3分钟(T3)测量血流动力学、血浆儿茶酚胺浓度和动脉血气。
T组的插管时间比L组短(12.6±1.7对23.5±2.9秒,均值±标准误;P<0.01)。与诱导前(T0)值相比,L组在T1和T3时收缩压(SBP)显著降低,T组在T1、T2和T3时SBP显著降低。两组在整个时间过程中心率(HR)和血浆去甲肾上腺素(NE)浓度均无变化,而两组在T2和T3时血浆肾上腺素(E)浓度均显著降低。两组气管插管后速率压力乘积(RPP:HR×SBP)的平均值均小于15000。两组在任何时间点的血流动力学或儿茶酚胺反应均无显著差异。两组均无患者出现缺血性ST-T改变。
尽管插管时间较短,但在老年高血压患者中,就气管插管的血流动力学和血浆儿茶酚胺反应而言,光棒并不优于喉镜。