Hirabayashi Y, Hiruta M, Kawakami T, Inoue S, Fukuda H, Saitoh K, Shimizu R
Department of Anaesthesiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan.
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;81(2):253-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.2.253.
We compared the effects of the lightwand technique on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation with those of direct-vision laryngoscopy. Forty adult patients received propofol and vecuronium, and their lungs were ventilated for 2 min via a mask with 5% sevoflurane in oxygen, after which the trachea was intubated orally using either the lightwand (Trachlight, n = 20) or the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 20). Maximum mean arterial pressure changes did not differ between groups during (lightwand group, 25 (SD 21) mm Hg vs laryngoscopy group, 23 (19) mm Hg) and after (21 (24) mm Hg vs 21 (16) mm Hg) tracheal intubation. Maximum heart rate changes were similar for groups during (16 (14) beat min-1 vs 16 (15) beat min-1) and after (2 (11) beat min-1 vs 7 (19) beat min-1) tracheal intubation. There were no differences between the lightwand technique and direct-vision laryngoscopy in changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate during and after tracheal intubation. We conclude that the effects of the lightwand technique on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation were similar to those of direct-vision laryngoscopy.
我们比较了光棒技术与直接喉镜检查对气管插管循环反应的影响。40例成年患者接受丙泊酚和维库溴铵,通过面罩给予5%七氟醚和氧气通气2分钟,之后分别使用光棒(Trachlight,n = 20)或Macintosh喉镜(n = 20)经口气管插管。气管插管期间(光棒组,25(标准差21)mmHg vs 喉镜检查组,23(19)mmHg)和之后(21(24)mmHg vs 21(16)mmHg),两组间最大平均动脉压变化无差异。气管插管期间(16(14)次/分钟 vs 16(15)次/分钟)和之后(2(11)次/分钟 vs 7(19)次/分钟),两组间最大心率变化相似。气管插管期间及之后,光棒技术与直接喉镜检查在平均动脉压和心率变化方面无差异。我们得出结论,光棒技术对气管插管循环反应的影响与直接喉镜检查相似。