Takahashi Shinji, Mizutani Taro, Miyabe Masayuki, Toyooka Hidenori
Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):480-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00046.
Lightwand devices are effective and safe as an aid to tracheal intubation. Theoretically, avoiding direct-vision laryngoscopy could allow for less stimulation by intubation than the conventional laryngoscopic procedure. We designed this prospective randomized study to assess the cardiovascular changes after either lightwand or direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in adult patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Sixty healthy adult patients with normal airways were randomly assigned to one of three groups according to intubating procedure under sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.33) (n = 20 each). The lightwand group received tracheal intubation with Trachlight, the laryngoscope-intubation group received tracheal intubation with a direct-vision laryngoscope (Macintosh blade), and the laryngoscopy-alone group received the laryngoscope alone. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were recorded continuously for 5 min after tracheal intubation or laryngoscopy with enough time to intubate. All procedures were successful on the first attempt. The maximum heart rate and systolic blood pressure values obtained after intubation with Trachlight (114 +/- 20 bpm and 143 +/- 30 mm Hg, respectively) did not differ from those with the Macintosh laryngoscope (114 +/- 20 bpm and 138 +/- 23 mm Hg), but they were significantly larger than those in the laryngoscopy-alone group (94 +/- 19 bpm and 112 +/- 21 mm Hg) (P < 0.05). Direct stimulation of the trachea appears to be a major cause of the hemodynamic changes associated with tracheal intubation.
The magnitude of hemodynamic changes associated with tracheal intubation with the Trachlight is almost the same as that which occurs with the direct laryngoscope. Hemodynamic changes are likely to occur because of direct tracheal irritation rather than direct stimulation of the larynx.
光棒装置作为气管插管辅助工具是有效且安全的。从理论上讲,与传统喉镜检查相比,避免直视喉镜检查可能会减少插管刺激。我们设计了这项前瞻性随机研究,以评估在接受七氟醚麻醉的成年患者中,使用光棒或直接喉镜进行气管插管后的心血管变化。60例气道正常的健康成年患者,在七氟醚/氧化亚氮麻醉(吸入氧分数=0.33)下,根据插管操作随机分为三组(每组n = 20)。光棒组使用Trachlight进行气管插管,喉镜插管组使用直视喉镜(麦金托什镜片)进行气管插管,单纯喉镜检查组仅使用喉镜。气管插管或喉镜检查后连续记录心率和收缩压5分钟,留出足够时间进行插管。所有操作首次尝试均成功。使用Trachlight插管后获得的最大心率和收缩压值(分别为114±20次/分和143±30 mmHg)与使用麦金托什喉镜时(114±20次/分和138±23 mmHg)无差异,但显著高于单纯喉镜检查组(94±19次/分和112±21 mmHg)(P < 0.05)。气管的直接刺激似乎是与气管插管相关的血流动力学变化的主要原因。
使用Trachlight气管插管相关的血流动力学变化幅度与直接喉镜检查时几乎相同。血流动力学变化可能是由于气管直接刺激而非喉部直接刺激引起的。