• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌根治术前新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗0个月与3个月的随机试验长期随访

Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Klotz L H, Goldenberg S L, Jewett M A, Fradet Y, Nam R, Barkin J, Chin J, Chatterjee S

机构信息

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre MG408, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):791-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081404.98273.fd.

DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000081404.98273.fd
PMID:12913699
Abstract

PURPOSE

In 1992 we initiated a national randomized prospective trial of 3 months of cyproterone acetate before radical prostatectomy compared to prostatectomy alone. Initial results indicated a 50% decrease in the rate of positive surgical margins. This decrease did not translate into a difference in prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression at 3 years. This report is on the long-term outcome (median followup 6 years) of this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open label trial compared 100 mg cyproterone acetate 3 times daily for 3 months before surgery to surgery alone. Randomization occurred between January 1993 and April 1994. Patients were stratified according to clinical stage, baseline serum PSA and Gleason sum. A total of 213 patients were accrued. Biochemical progression was defined as 2 consecutive detectable PSAs (greater than 0.2 ng/ml) at least 4 weeks apart, re-treatment or death from prostate cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 34 (33.6%) patients undergoing surgery only and 42 (37.5%) patients given neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) had biochemical recurrence during the median followup of 6 years. Despite the significant pathological down staging in this study, there was no significant difference in number of patients with no evidence of biochemical disease (bNED) survival (p = 0.732). A bNED survival benefit favoring NHT was seen in men with a baseline PSA greater than 20 (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 years of followup there was no overall benefit with 3 months of NHT. Improved bNED survival was seen in the highest risk PSA group (PSA greater than 20). The possibility that high risk patients may benefit from NHT warrants further investigation.

摘要

目的

1992年我们启动了一项全国性随机前瞻性试验,对比在根治性前列腺切除术前行3个月醋酸环丙孕酮治疗与单纯前列腺切除术的效果。初步结果显示手术切缘阳性率降低了50%。但这一降低并未转化为3年时前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)进展方面的差异。本报告是关于该队列的长期结果(中位随访6年)。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验将术前每天3次服用100毫克醋酸环丙孕酮,共3个月的治疗方案与单纯手术进行比较。随机分组于1993年1月至1994年4月进行。患者根据临床分期、基线血清PSA和Gleason评分进行分层。共招募了213例患者。生化进展定义为连续2次可检测到PSA(大于0.2纳克/毫升),间隔至少4周,再次治疗或死于前列腺癌。

结果

在中位6年的随访期间,仅接受手术的34例(33.6%)患者和接受新辅助激素治疗(NHT)的42例(37.5%)患者出现了生化复发。尽管本研究中病理分期有显著下降,但无生化疾病证据(bNED)存活的患者数量无显著差异(p = 0.732)。在基线PSA大于20的男性中,观察到NHT在bNED存活方面有优势(p = 0.015)。

结论

随访6年后,3个月的NHT无总体益处。在最高风险的PSA组(PSA大于20)中观察到bNED存活有所改善。高风险患者可能从NHT中获益这一可能性值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术前新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗0个月与3个月的随机试验长期随访
J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):791-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081404.98273.fd.
2
CUOG randomized trial of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy: 36-month post-treatment PSA results. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的CUOG随机试验:治疗后36个月的前列腺特异性抗原结果。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组
Urology. 1999 Apr;53(4):757-63. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00616-5.
3
Long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: evaluation of risk for biochemical recurrence at 5-year follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术前行长期新辅助激素治疗:5年随访时生化复发风险评估
Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):289-94. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00627-0.
4
Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: does transient androgen suppression improve outcomes?前列腺癌根治术后放疗:短暂雄激素抑制能否改善预后?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.015.
5
The limited significance of a longer duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in Japanese men.在日本男性中,新辅助激素治疗持续时间延长对高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术的意义有限。
Urol Int. 2006;77(2):122-6. doi: 10.1159/000093904.
6
Predictors of pathological stage before neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy and radical prostatectomy. The Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.新辅助雄激素去势治疗和根治性前列腺切除术前病理分期的预测因素。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组。
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):925-8.
7
Biochemical and pathological effects of 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically confined prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌患者在根治性前列腺切除术前行8个月新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的生化和病理效应
J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):213-9.
8
[8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer].高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前行8个月新辅助激素治疗
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Jul;97(5):712-8. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.97.712.
9
Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.比较单纯根治性前列腺切除术与新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗局限性前列腺癌的随机、前瞻性、对照研究。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组。
J Urol. 1996 Sep;156(3):873-7.
10
Update on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center studies of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心前列腺癌新辅助激素治疗研究进展
Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):241-8;discussion 249-50.

引用本文的文献

1
The comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant novel and classical hormonal therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective study.局部晚期前列腺癌患者新辅助新型激素疗法与传统激素疗法的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 24;25(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01811-w.
2
Current Status of Neoadjuvant Treatment Before Surgery in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌术前新辅助治疗的现状
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;17(1):99. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010099.
3
Neoadjuvant lutetium PSMA, the TIME and immune response in high-risk localized prostate cancer.
新辅助镥 PSMA、TIME 与高危局限性前列腺癌的免疫应答。
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Nov;21(11):676-686. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00913-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Drug-Induced Epigenomic Plasticity Reprograms Circadian Rhythm Regulation to Drive Prostate Cancer toward Androgen Independence.药物诱导的表观基因组可塑性重塑生物钟节律调节,导致前列腺癌向雄激素非依赖性进展。
Cancer Discov. 2022 Sep 2;12(9):2074-2097. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0576.
5
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌根治术前的新辅助化学激素治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 May 11;12:906370. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.906370. eCollection 2022.
6
Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation in Localised Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗反应的生物标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 29;14(1):166. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010166.
7
Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.韩国泌尿科医生在根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性方面的实践模式:一项调查和叙述性综述。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 25;36(41):e256. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e256.
8
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助激素治疗。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Dec;18(12):739-762. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00514-9. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.延迟性根治性前列腺切除术与主动监测对局限性前列腺癌的影响——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 30;13(13):3274. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133274.
10
Do androgen-directed therapies improve outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.雄激素导向疗法能否改善接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的预后?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Aug;15(8):269-279. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7041.