• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较单纯根治性前列腺切除术与新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗局限性前列腺癌的随机、前瞻性、对照研究。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组。

Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.

作者信息

Goldenberg S L, Klotz L H, Srigley J, Jewett M A, Mador D, Fradet Y, Barkin J, Chin J, Paquin J M, Bullock M J, Laplante S

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 1996 Sep;156(3):873-7.

PMID:8709351
Abstract

PURPOSE

A prospective, multicenter, randomized study was done to test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal decreases the incidence of positive margins following radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observations were made of 213 patients randomized to undergo radical prostatectomy alone (101) or to receive a 12-week course of 300 mg. cyproterone acetate daily followed by surgery (112). Groups were similar at baseline in terms of clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and Gleason score. Of 192 patients available for efficacy analysis 9 had stage T1b, 8 stage T1c, 63 stage T2a, 36 stage T2b and 76 stage T2c disease.

RESULTS

One or more positive surgical margins were found in 59 of 91 patients (64.8%) in the surgery only group compared to 28 of 101 (27.7%) in the cyproterone acetate group (p = 0.001). Patients who received preoperative therapy had a statistically significantly lower rate of apical margin involvement than those who did not (17.8 versus 47.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in surgical (p = 0.8645) or postoperative (p = 0.173) complications between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal with a 12-week course of 300 mg. cyproterone acetate daily results in a lower rate of positive margins without adversely affecting postoperative recovery. The impact on patient survival will be determined by long-term followup.

摘要

目的

开展一项前瞻性、多中心、随机研究,以检验新辅助雄激素剥夺疗法可降低局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性发生率这一假设。

材料与方法

观察了213例患者,这些患者被随机分为单纯接受根治性前列腺切除术组(101例)或先接受为期12周、每日300毫克醋酸环丙孕酮治疗然后再接受手术组(112例)。两组在临床分期、血清前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分方面的基线情况相似。在可供疗效分析的192例患者中,9例为T1b期,8例为T1c期,63例为T2a期,36例为T2b期,76例为T2c期疾病。

结果

单纯手术组91例患者中有59例(64.8%)发现一处或多处手术切缘阳性,而醋酸环丙孕酮组101例中有28例(27.7%)出现切缘阳性(p = 0.001)。接受术前治疗的患者尖部切缘受累率在统计学上显著低于未接受术前治疗的患者(分别为17.8%对47.8%,p < 0.0001)。两组在手术(p = 0.8645)或术后(p = 0.173)并发症方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

为期12周、每日300毫克醋酸环丙孕酮的新辅助雄激素剥夺疗法可降低切缘阳性率,且对术后恢复无不良影响。对患者生存的影响将通过长期随访来确定。

相似文献

1
Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.比较单纯根治性前列腺切除术与新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗局限性前列腺癌的随机、前瞻性、对照研究。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组。
J Urol. 1996 Sep;156(3):873-7.
2
Predictors of pathological stage before neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy and radical prostatectomy. The Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.新辅助雄激素去势治疗和根治性前列腺切除术前病理分期的预测因素。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组。
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):925-8.
3
CUOG randomized trial of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy: 36-month post-treatment PSA results. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的CUOG随机试验:治疗后36个月的前列腺特异性抗原结果。加拿大泌尿外科肿瘤学组
Urology. 1999 Apr;53(4):757-63. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00616-5.
4
Long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: evaluation of risk for biochemical recurrence at 5-year follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术前行长期新辅助激素治疗:5年随访时生化复发风险评估
Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):289-94. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00627-0.
5
Re: Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.回复:比较单纯根治性前列腺切除术与新辅助雄激素去势治疗局限性前列腺癌的随机、前瞻性、对照研究
J Urol. 1997 Mar;157(3):965. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65116-4.
6
Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术前新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗0个月与3个月的随机试验长期随访
J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):791-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081404.98273.fd.
7
Biochemical and pathological effects of 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically confined prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌患者在根治性前列腺切除术前行8个月新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的生化和病理效应
J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):213-9.
8
Randomized prospective study comparing radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy preceded by androgen blockade in clinical stage B2 (T2bNxM0) prostate cancer. The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group.比较单纯根治性前列腺切除术与在临床分期为B2(T2bNxM0)的前列腺癌中先行雄激素阻断再行根治性前列腺切除术的随机前瞻性研究。醋酸亮丙瑞林长效注射剂新辅助前列腺癌研究组。
J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):424-8.
9
Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before radical prostatectomy: who is unlikely to benefit?
Br J Urol. 1997 Feb;79(2):221-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.26714.x.
10
Neoadjuvant hormone therapy: the Canadian trials.新辅助激素治疗:加拿大的试验。
Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):233-7;discussion 239.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Status of Neoadjuvant Treatment Before Surgery in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌术前新辅助治疗的现状
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;17(1):99. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010099.
2
A low molecular weight multifunctional theranostic molecule for the treatment of prostate cancer.一种用于治疗前列腺癌的低分子量多功能治疗一体分子。
Theranostics. 2022 Feb 21;12(5):2335-2350. doi: 10.7150/thno.68715. eCollection 2022.
3
Co-Inhibition of Androgen Receptor and PARP as a Novel Treatment Paradigm in Prostate Cancer-Where Are We Now?
雄激素受体与聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶的联合抑制作为前列腺癌的一种新型治疗模式——我们目前的进展如何?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 4;14(3):801. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030801.
4
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助激素治疗。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Dec;18(12):739-762. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00514-9. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.延迟性根治性前列腺切除术与主动监测对局限性前列腺癌的影响——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 30;13(13):3274. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133274.
6
The Impact of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy on Surgical and Oncological Outcomes for Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新辅助激素治疗对前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术前手术及肿瘤学结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 8;10:615801. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615801. eCollection 2020.
7
Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer.高危前列腺癌的新辅助治疗
Indian J Urol. 2020 Oct-Dec;36(4):251-261. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_115_20. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Impact of time to testosterone rebound and comorbidity on the risk of cause-specific mortality in men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer.雄激素反弹时间和合并症对预后不良前列腺癌患者特定原因死亡率风险的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;124(7):1391-1399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31217. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
The use of Hormonal Therapy to Augment Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: An Update.激素疗法辅助放射治疗前列腺癌:最新进展
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Jul;18(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0698-3.
10
Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments for patient-centered outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA Compliant).以患者为中心的结局下前列腺癌治疗的比较效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析(遵循PRISMA)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(18):e6790. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006790.