Sant G R, Propert K J, Hanno P M, Burks D, Culkin D, Diokno A C, Hardy C, Landis J R, Mayer R, Madigan R, Messing E M, Peters K, Theoharides T C, Warren J, Wein A J, Steers W, Kusek J W, Nyberg L M
New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):810-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000083020.06212.3d.
This pilot study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial in interstitial cystitis (IC). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS), hydroxyzine, and the combination to consider their use in a larger randomized clinical trial.
A 2 x 2 factorial study design was used to evaluate PPS and hydroxyzine. Participants met the National Institutes of Health-National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases criteria for IC and reported at least moderate pain and frequency for a minimum of 6 months before study entry. The primary end point was a patient reported global response assessment. Secondary end points included validated symptom indexes and patient reports of pain, urgency and frequency. The target sample size was 136 participants recruited during 10 months.
A total of 121 (89% of goal) participants were randomized over 18 months and 79% provided complete followup data. The response rate for hydroxyzine was 31% for those treated and 20% for those not treated (p = 0.26). A nonsignificant trend was seen in the PPS treatment groups (34%) as compared to no PPS (18%, p = 0.064). There were no treatment differences for any of the secondary end points. Adverse events were mostly minor and similar to those in previous reports.
The low global response rates for PPS and hydroxyzine suggest that neither provided benefit for the majority of patients with IC. This trial demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a multicenter randomized clinical trial in IC using uniform procedures and outcomes. However, slow recruitment underscored the difficulties of evaluating commonly available IC drugs.
本初步研究旨在评估在间质性膀胱炎(IC)中进行多中心、随机临床试验的可行性。次要目标是评估口服聚多卡醇硫酸酯钠(PPS)、羟嗪及其联合用药的安全性和有效性,以便考虑在更大规模的随机临床试验中使用。
采用2×2析因研究设计来评估PPS和羟嗪。参与者符合美国国立卫生研究院-国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所的IC标准,且在研究入组前至少6个月报告有至少中度疼痛和尿频症状。主要终点是患者报告的总体反应评估。次要终点包括经过验证的症状指数以及患者对疼痛、尿急和尿频的报告。目标样本量为在10个月内招募的136名参与者。
在18个月内共有121名(占目标的89%)参与者被随机分组,79%的参与者提供了完整的随访数据。接受羟嗪治疗的患者缓解率为31%,未接受治疗的患者为20%(p = 0.26)。与未使用PPS的组(18%,p = 0.064)相比,PPS治疗组有不显著的趋势(34%)。任何次要终点均无治疗差异。不良事件大多轻微,与既往报告相似。
PPS和羟嗪的总体缓解率较低,表明两者对大多数IC患者均无益处。本试验证明了使用统一程序和结果在IC中进行多中心随机临床试验的可行性。然而,招募缓慢凸显了评估常用IC药物的困难。