• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Human gene patents: the possible impacts on genetic services healthcare.

作者信息

Walpole Ian R, Dawkins Hugh J S, Sinden Peter D, O'Leary Peter C

机构信息

Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Subiaco, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2003 Aug 18;179(4):203. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05500.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05500.x
PMID:12914511
Abstract

The patent system has been seen as a critical factor driving innovation in clinical medicine, particularly in medical devices and diagnostic assays. The licence terms and business model proposed by Myriad Genetics Inc. for testing the hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 could stifle innovation (particularly if other companies adopt similar business models), and are likely to limit the ability to provide high quality public genetic testing services in Australia. Under the Myriad model, testing for the BRCA1 gene would be undertaken by an organisation removed from the integrated public healthcare system. Based on overseas experience, Australia can expect a 2-3-fold increase in the cost of this testing, which will provide only partial information on the hereditary breast cancer status of the patient. Commercial exploitation of gene patents needs to be regulated to balance the patent holders' right to profit from their inventions (necessary to drive further innovation) and the public policy objective of high quality, equitable healthcare.

摘要

相似文献

1
Human gene patents: the possible impacts on genetic services healthcare.
Med J Aust. 2003 Aug 18;179(4):203. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05500.x.
2
Do patents impede the provision of genetic tests in Australia?专利是否阻碍了澳大利亚基因检测服务的提供?
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):281-5. doi: 10.1071/AH13029.
3
The European opposition against the BRCA gene patents.欧洲对BRCA基因专利的反对。
Fam Cancer. 2006;5(1):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-2580-6.
4
European opposition to exclusive control over predictive breast cancer testing and the inherent implications for U.S. patent law and public policy: a case study of the Myriad Genetics' BRCA patent controversy.欧洲对乳腺癌预测性检测独家控制权的反对以及对美国专利法和公共政策的内在影响:以Myriad Genetics公司的BRCA专利争议为例
Food Drug Law J. 2004;59(1):133-54.
5
Gene patent ruling could thwart research, experts fear.专家担心基因专利裁决可能会阻碍研究。
BMJ. 2013 Feb 20;346:f1144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1144.
6
Actor-network theory: a tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing.行动者网络理论:一种支持商业基因检测伦理分析的工具。
New Genet Soc. 2003 Dec;22(3):271-96. doi: 10.1080/1463677032000147225.
7
Human gene patents: under whose control?人类基因专利:由谁掌控?
Med J Aust. 2003 Aug 18;179(4):181-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05494.x.
8
Direct to confusion: lessons learned from marketing BRCA testing.直接导致混乱:从BRCA检测营销中吸取的教训。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jun;8(6):5-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160802248179.
9
Your money or your life.要钱还是要命。
New Sci. 2002 Jul 13;175(2351):28-33.
10
[The Supreme Court free genes - economic and legal justifications - impacts on innovation and the healthcare offer].[最高法院的自由基因——经济和法律依据——对创新及医疗服务的影响]
Med Sci (Paris). 2015 Feb;31(2):209-13. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20153102019. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
It's about scientific secrecy, dummy: a better equilibrium among genomics patenting, scientific research and health care.这是关于科学保密的问题,蠢货:在基因组专利、科学研究和医疗保健之间取得更好的平衡。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):263-84. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9257-3. Epub 2011 Feb 13.
2
Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions.促进获取基因发明专利的模式。
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Feb;7(2):143-8. doi: 10.1038/nrg1765.