• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种情绪调节过程中的个体差异:对情感、人际关系和幸福感的影响。

Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

作者信息

Gross James J, John Oliver P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, California 94305-2130, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
PMID:12916575
Abstract

Five studies tested two general hypotheses: Individuals differ in their use of emotion regulation strategies such as reappraisal and suppression, and these individual differences have implications for affect, well-being, and social relationships. Study 1 presents new measures of the habitual use of reappraisal and suppression. Study 2 examines convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 shows that reappraisers experience and express greater positive emotion and lesser negative emotion, whereas suppressors experience and express lesser positive emotion, yet experience greater negative emotion. Study 4 indicates that using reappraisal is associated with better interpersonal functioning, whereas using suppression is associated with worse interpersonal functioning. Study 5 shows that using reappraisal is related positively to well-being, whereas using suppression is related negatively.

摘要

五项研究检验了两个一般性假设

个体在重新评价和抑制等情绪调节策略的使用上存在差异,且这些个体差异对情感、幸福感和社会关系有影响。研究1提出了重新评价和抑制习惯性使用的新测量方法。研究2检验了聚合效度和区分效度。研究3表明,采用重新评价的人体验和表达更多的积极情绪,更少的消极情绪,而采用抑制的人体验和表达更少的积极情绪,但体验到更多的消极情绪。研究4表明,使用重新评价与更好的人际功能相关,而使用抑制则与更差的人际功能相关。研究5表明,使用重新评价与幸福感呈正相关,而使用抑制与幸福感呈负相关。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.两种情绪调节过程中的个体差异:对情感、人际关系和幸福感的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
2
Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development.健康与不健康的情绪调节:人格过程、个体差异与毕生发展
J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1301-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x.
3
Regulating positive and negative emotions in daily life.在日常生活中调节积极和消极情绪。
J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):561-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00496.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
4
Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional concordance using a multivariate multilevel model.采用多元多层模型检验抑制和重评对情绪一致性的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2014 Apr;98:6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
5
Inter-individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are associated with variations in prefrontal cognitive control for emotional information: an event related fMRI study.习惯性使用认知重评和表达抑制的个体间差异与情绪信息的前额叶认知控制变化有关:一项事件相关 fMRI 研究。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Mar;92(3):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
6
Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression.日常生活中的情绪调节策略:正念、认知重评和情绪抑制。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2017 Mar;46(2):91-113. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1218926. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
Emotion regulation and the temporal dynamics of emotions: Effects of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression on emotional inertia.情绪调节与情绪的时间动态:认知重评和表达抑制对情绪惯性的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(5):831-51. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.948388. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
8
When holding back helps: suppressing negative emotions during sacrifice feels authentic and is beneficial for highly interdependent people.当抑制情绪有帮助时:在牺牲时抑制消极情绪会让人感到真实,并对高度相互依存的人有益。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1809-15. doi: 10.1177/0956797613475365. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being.重新评估和抑制情绪调节倾向对奖励反应性和心理健康的预测存在差异。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jan;140:35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Individual differences in cognitive control processes and their relationship to emotion regulation.认知控制过程中的个体差异及其与情绪调节的关系。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Aug;30(5):912-24. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1032893. Epub 2015 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in emotion regulation components underlie the sexual orientation disparity in depressive symptoms: a prospective, Population-based study of young adults.情绪调节成分的差异是抑郁症状中性取向差异的基础:一项基于人群的年轻成年人前瞻性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02974-5.
2
An adaptive simulation intervention decreases emergency physician physiologic stress while caring for patients during COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial.一项适应性模拟干预措施可降低急诊医生在新冠疫情期间护理患者时的生理应激反应:一项随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0331488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331488. eCollection 2025.
3
Trajectories of Rumination and Negative Cognitive Style from Late Childhood Through Adolescence: Modeling Normative Growth Patterns and Predicting Cognitive Vulnerabilities.
从童年晚期到青春期的反刍思维和消极认知风格轨迹:模拟规范性成长模式并预测认知脆弱性
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1177/21677026251335346.
4
The complexity of associations between emotion regulation, interpersonal sensitivity, cognitive insight, and non-suicidal self-injury: a study based on network analysis.情绪调节、人际敏感性、认知洞察力与非自杀性自伤之间关联的复杂性:一项基于网络分析的研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07231-2.
5
Capturing the dynamics of adolescent emotion regulation in anxiety-inducing situations through development and evaluation of a state emotion regulation questionnaire for adolescents.通过开发和评估青少年状态情绪调节问卷,捕捉青少年在诱发焦虑情境中的情绪调节动态。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17051-9.
6
Temporal dynamics of CBT emotion regulation training in patients with major depression using ecological momentary assessment.使用生态瞬时评估法对重度抑郁症患者进行认知行为疗法情绪调节训练的时间动态变化
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 30;15(1):31992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16344-3.
7
Study protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with reappraisal training for treatment of cannabis use disorder.一项关于经颅直流电刺激联合重新评估训练治疗大麻使用障碍的先导性随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0328205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328205. eCollection 2025.
8
Experiential Avoidance, Dyadic Interaction and Relationship Quality in the Lives of Veterans and Their Partners.退伍军人及其伴侣生活中的经验性回避、二元互动与关系质量
J Fam Issues. 2018 Apr;39(5):1191-1212. doi: 10.1177/0192513x17698182. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
9
When Age Matters: How Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy in Managing Negative Emotions Can Mitigate the Effects of Emotional Inertia for Younger Workers.年龄何时重要:在管理负面情绪时,调节情绪自我效能如何减轻年轻员工情绪惯性的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;13(16):2047. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162047.
10
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a resistance exercise training to treat major depression via cerebrovascular mechanisms (RESIST Trial).一项通过脑血管机制进行抗阻运动训练治疗重度抑郁症的随机对照试验方案(RESIST试验)
Trials. 2025 Aug 26;26(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09025-z.