• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟任务和图形表示对图形阅读任务中反应潜伏期的影响。

Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph reading task.

作者信息

Peebles David, Cheng Peter C H

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2003 Spring;45(1):28-46. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.1.28.27225.

DOI:10.1518/hfes.45.1.28.27225
PMID:12916580
Abstract

We report an investigation into the processes involved in a common graph-reading task using two types of Cartesian graph. We describe an experiment and eye movement study, the results of which show that optimal scan paths assumed in the task analysis approximate the detailed sequences of saccades made by individuals. The research demonstrates the computational inequivalence of two sets of informationally equivalent graphs and illustrates how the computational advantages of a representation outweigh factors such as user unfamiliarity. We describe two models, using the ACT rational perceptual motor (ACT-R/PM) cognitive architecture, that replicate the pattern of observed response latencies and the complex scan paths revealed by the eye movement study. Finally, we outline three guidelines for designers of visual displays: Designers should (a) consider how different quantities are encoded within any chosen representational format, (b) consider the full range of alternative varieties of a given task, and (c) balance the cost of familiarization with the computational advantages of less familiar representations. Actual or potential applications of this research include informing the design and selection of appropriate visual displays and illustrating the practice and utility of task analysis, eye tracking, and cognitive modeling for understanding interactive tasks with external representations.

摘要

我们报告了一项针对使用两种笛卡尔图的常见图形阅读任务所涉及过程的调查。我们描述了一项实验和眼动研究,其结果表明任务分析中假设的最佳扫描路径近似于个体所做扫视的详细序列。该研究证明了两组信息等效图形在计算上的不等价性,并说明了一种表示形式的计算优势如何超过诸如用户不熟悉等因素。我们使用ACT合理感知运动(ACT-R/PM)认知架构描述了两个模型,它们复制了观察到的反应潜伏期模式以及眼动研究揭示的复杂扫描路径。最后,我们为视觉显示器设计师概述了三条指导原则:设计师应(a)考虑在任何选定的表示格式中不同数量是如何编码的,(b)考虑给定任务的所有替代变体,以及(c)在熟悉成本与不太熟悉表示形式的计算优势之间取得平衡。这项研究的实际或潜在应用包括为适当视觉显示器的设计和选择提供信息,以及说明任务分析、眼动追踪和认知建模对于理解与外部表示形式的交互任务的实践和效用。

相似文献

1
Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph reading task.模拟任务和图形表示对图形阅读任务中反应潜伏期的影响。
Hum Factors. 2003 Spring;45(1):28-46. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.1.28.27225.
2
Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link.使用 E-Z 阅读器模拟非阅读任务中的眼球运动:理解眼脑链接的统一框架。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):155-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026473.
3
Eye Movement Analysis and Cognitive Assessment. The Use of Comparative Visual Search Tasks in a Non-immersive VR Application.眼动分析与认知评估。非沉浸式虚拟现实应用中比较视觉搜索任务的使用。
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Mar 23;56(2):112-116. doi: 10.3414/ME16-02-0006. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
4
The adaptive nature of eye movements in linguistic tasks: how payoff and architecture shape speed-accuracy trade-offs.语言任务中眼球运动的适应性:收益和结构如何塑造速度-准确性权衡。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):581-610. doi: 10.1111/tops.12032. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
5
Is there a common control mechanism for anti-saccades and reading eye movements? Evidence from distributional analyses.反扫视和阅读眼动是否存在共同的控制机制?来自分布分析的证据。
Vision Res. 2012 Mar 15;57:35-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
Visual and memory search in complex environments: determinants of eye movements and search performance.在复杂环境中的视觉和记忆搜索:眼动和搜索表现的决定因素。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):1009-27. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.689372. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
7
Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?阅读消失文本时的眼动:阅读中存在间隙效应吗?
Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):1013-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.002.
8
A componential model of human interaction with graphs: VI. Cognitive engineering of pie graphs.人类与图表交互的成分模型:VI. 饼图的认知工程
Hum Factors. 2000 Winter;42(4):566-91. doi: 10.1518/001872000779698024.
9
Thin-section CT of the lungs: eye-tracking analysis of the visual approach to reading tiled and stacked display formats.肺部薄层CT:对平铺式和叠加式显示格式阅片视觉方法的眼动追踪分析
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Aug;59(2):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
10
Eye Movements Reveal the Influence of Event Structure on Reading Behavior.眼动揭示事件结构对阅读行为的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;40(2):466-80. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12240. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating convergence between two data visualization literacy assessments.评估两种数据可视化素养评估之间的收敛性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Apr 5;10(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00622-9.
2
Subjective data models in bioinformatics and how wet lab and computational biologists conceptualise data.生物信息学中的主观数据模型,以及湿实验生物学家和计算生物学家如何概念化数据。
Sci Data. 2023 Nov 2;10(1):756. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02627-9.
3
Graph schema and best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, line, and pie.用于比较离散组的图形模式和最佳图形类型:条形图、折线图和饼图。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 19;13:991420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991420. eCollection 2022.
4
Best Graph Type to Compare Discrete Groups: Bar, Dot, and Tally.比较离散组的最佳图表类型:条形图、点图和计数图。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:775721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775721. eCollection 2021.
5
Expert interpretation of bar and line graphs: the role of graphicacy in reducing the effect of graph format.柱状图和折线图的专家解读:图形素养在减少图表格式影响方面的作用
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 30;6:1673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01673. eCollection 2015.
6
Understanding the Required Resources in Line Graph Comprehension.理解折线图理解中所需的资源。
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2008 Sep;52(22):1830-1834. doi: 10.1177/154193120805202210.
7
Flexibility in data interpretation: effects of representational format.数据解释的灵活性:表示格式的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 31;4:980. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00980. eCollection 2013.
8
Shedding light on the graph schema: perceptual features versus invariant structure.揭示图形模式:感知特征与不变结构
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):757-62. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.757.
9
Men's interpretations of graphical information in a videotape decision aid.男性对录像带决策辅助工具中图形信息的解读。
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):184-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00443.x.