Reinhard M, Roth M, Müller T, Czosnyka M, Timmer J, Hetzel A
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2138-44. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087788.65566.AC. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
Estimation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation from spontaneous fluctuations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) is an attractive monitoring option for cerebral hemodynamic impairment. We evaluated the correlation coefficient index method in patients with severe obstructive carotid disease and compared it with transfer function analysis (frequency domain approach to cerebral autoregulation) and CO2 vasomotor reactivity.
In 139 patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis (>or=70%) or occlusion, CBFV (transcranial Doppler) and ABP (Finapres method) were recorded over 10 minutes. Correlations between systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and mean ABP and CBFV oscillations over 1-minute epochs were averaged over 10 minutes to form the correlation coefficient indexes (Sx, Dx, Mx, respectively). Transfer function parameters (phase shift and gain between ABP and CBFV oscillations) were determined from the entire 10-minute period. CO2 reactivity was assessed by inhalation of 7% CO2.
The correlation indexes Dx and Mx were significantly higher ipsilateral to stenosis and increased with degree of stenosis, indicating increasing dependence of CBFV on ABP and thus impairment of cerebral autoregulation. Dx and Mx correlated moderately but highly significantly with transfer function parameters and CO2 reactivity and showed a good level of agreement in detecting pathological values. Patients with a small variance of the 1-minute source correlations of Dx and Mx showed clearly better correlation values. Transfer function parameters and CO2 reactivity but not Dx and Mx were significantly poorer in patients with symptomatic stenosis or occlusion.
The potential of the correlation coefficient indexes Dx and Mx in detecting hemodynamic impairment in patients with carotid stenosis is comparable to that of transfer function analysis and CO2 reactivity testing. In future, a combination of various hemodynamic tests might help to identify patients at risk for ischemic events.
根据动脉血压(ABP)和脑血流速度(CBFV)的自发波动来评估动态脑自动调节功能,是监测脑血流动力学损害的一种有吸引力的方法。我们评估了重度颈动脉阻塞性疾病患者的相关系数指数法,并将其与传递函数分析(脑自动调节功能的频域分析法)和二氧化碳血管运动反应性进行比较。
对139例单侧重度颈动脉狭窄(≥70%)或闭塞患者,记录10分钟的CBFV(经颅多普勒)和ABP(Finapres法)。将收缩压、舒张压和平均ABP与1分钟时段内CBFV振荡之间的相关性在10分钟内进行平均,以形成相关系数指数(分别为Sx、Dx、Mx)。从整个10分钟时段确定传递函数参数(ABP和CBFV振荡之间的相位偏移和增益)。通过吸入7%二氧化碳评估二氧化碳反应性。
狭窄同侧的相关指数Dx和Mx显著更高,且随狭窄程度增加,表明CBFV对ABP的依赖性增加,从而脑自动调节功能受损。Dx和Mx与传递函数参数及二氧化碳反应性呈中度但高度显著相关,在检测病理值方面显示出良好的一致性。Dx和Mx的1分钟源相关性方差较小的患者,其相关性值明显更好。有症状性狭窄或闭塞的患者,传递函数参数和二氧化碳反应性显著较差,但Dx和Mx并非如此。
相关系数指数Dx和Mx在检测颈动脉狭窄患者血流动力学损害方面的潜力,与传递函数分析和二氧化碳反应性测试相当。未来,多种血流动力学测试的联合应用可能有助于识别有缺血事件风险的患者。