Suppr超能文献

头孢氨苄每日两次与每日三次给药对比头孢羟氨苄每日一次给药治疗链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的疗效

Efficacy of cephalexin two vs. three times daily vs. cefadroxil once daily for streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

作者信息

Curtin Correne D, Casey Janet R, Murray Patrick C, Cleary Carolyn T, Hoeger William J, Marsocci Steven M, Murphy Marie Lynd, Francis Anne B, Pichichero Michael E

机构信息

Elmwood Pediatric Group, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2003 Jul-Aug;42(6):519-26. doi: 10.1177/000992280304200606.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of oral cephalexin twice vs. three times daily vs. cefadroxil once daily as therapy for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. A prospective open-label, observational cohort study was conducted over 18 months (January 2000-June 2001). Children enrolled had an acute onset of symptoms and signs of a tonsillopharyngeal illness and a laboratory-documented GABHS infection. Follow-up examination and laboratory testing occurred 21 +/- 4 days following enrollment. Two hundred seventy-one patients were enrolled (intent to treat group): 63 received cephalexin twice daily, 124 received cephalexin three times daily, and 84 received cefadroxil once daily. Fifty-three children did not return for the follow-up visit, leaving 218 patients in the per-protocol group: 54 cephalexin twice-daily treated, 94 cephalexin 3-times daily treated, and 70 cefadroxil once-daily treated. In the per-protocol group, bacteriologic cure for those treated with cephalexin twice daily was 87%, for cephalexin 3 times daily, it was 81% and for cefadroxil once daily it was 81% (p = 0.61). The clinical cure rate for cephalexin twice-daily treatment was 91%; for three-times daily, it was 86%; and for cefadroxil once daily, it was 84% (p = 0.56). Because treatment allocation was not randomized, logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for treatment group differences. Younger age of patient was significantly associated with bacteriologic (p = 0.04) and clinical (p = 0.01) failure independent of treatment group but in the adjusted logistic model no differences were found among the 3 treatment regimens. Cephalexin dosed twice daily or three times daily and cefadroxil dosed once daily appear equivalent in bacteriologic and clinical cure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较口服头孢氨苄每日两次、每日三次与头孢羟氨苄每日一次治疗A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)扁桃体咽炎的细菌学疗效和临床疗效。一项前瞻性开放标签观察性队列研究进行了18个月(2000年1月至2001年6月)。纳入的儿童有扁桃体咽炎疾病的急性症状和体征,且实验室确诊为GABHS感染。在入组后21±4天进行随访检查和实验室检测。共纳入271例患者(意向性治疗组):63例每日接受两次头孢氨苄治疗,124例每日接受三次头孢氨苄治疗,84例每日接受一次头孢羟氨苄治疗。53名儿童未返回进行随访,因此符合方案组有218名患者:54例接受每日两次头孢氨苄治疗,94例接受每日三次头孢氨苄治疗,70例接受每日一次头孢羟氨苄治疗。在符合方案组中,每日两次服用头孢氨苄的患者细菌学治愈率为87%,每日三次服用头孢氨苄的患者为81%,每日一次服用头孢羟氨苄的患者为81%(p = 0.61)。每日两次服用头孢氨苄的临床治愈率为91%;每日三次服用为86%;每日一次服用头孢羟氨苄的为84%(p = 0.56)。由于治疗分配未随机化,因此使用逻辑回归分析来调整治疗组差异。患者年龄较小与细菌学(p = 0.04)和临床(p = 0.01)治疗失败显著相关,且与治疗组无关,但在调整后的逻辑模型中,三种治疗方案之间未发现差异。每日两次或三次服用头孢氨苄以及每日一次服用头孢羟氨苄在GABHS扁桃体咽炎的细菌学和临床治愈方面似乎等效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验