Casey Janet R, Pichichero Michael E
Department of Pediatrics, Elmwood Pediatric Group, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14620, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):866-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.866.
To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis in children.
Medline, Embase, reference lists, and abstract searches were conducted to identify randomized, controlled trials of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis in children. Trials were included if they met the following criteria: patients <18 years old, bacteriologic confirmation of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis, random assignment to antibiotic therapy of an orally administered cephalosporin or penicillin for 10 days of treatment, and assessment of bacteriologic outcome using a throat culture after therapy. Primary outcomes of interest were bacteriologic and clinical cure rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of careful clinical illness descriptions, compliance monitoring, GABHS serotyping, exclusion of GABHS carriers, and timing of the test-of-cure visit.
Thirty-five trials involving 7125 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall summary odds ratio (OR) for the bacteriologic cure rate significantly favored cephalosporins compared with penicillin (OR: 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49-3.67, with the individual cephalosporins [cephalexin, cefadroxil, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, cefixime, ceftibuten, and cefdinir] showing superior bacteriologic cure rates). The overall summary OR for clinical cure rate was 2.33 (95% CI: 1.84-2.97), significantly favoring the same individual cephalosporins. There was a trend for diminishing bacterial cure with penicillin over time, comparing the trials published in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Sensitivity analyses for bacterial cure significantly favored cephalosporin treatment over penicillin treatment when trials were grouped as double-blind (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.39-3.85), high-quality (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.85-3.36) trials with well-defined clinical status (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.54-2.90), with detailed compliance monitoring (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 2.33-3.47), with GABHS serotyping (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 2.42-3.98), with carriers eliminated (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.55-4.08), and with test of cure 3 to 14 days posttreatment (OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 2.75-4.54). Analysis of comparative bacteriologic cure rates for the 3 generations of cephalosporins did not show a difference.
This meta-analysis indicates that the likelihood of bacteriologic and clinical failure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis is significantly less if an oral cephalosporin is prescribed, compared with oral penicillin.
对头孢菌素与青霉素治疗儿童A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)扁桃体咽炎的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。
通过检索Medline、Embase、参考文献列表及摘要,以确定头孢菌素与青霉素治疗儿童GABHS扁桃体咽炎的随机对照试验。若试验符合以下标准则纳入:患者年龄<18岁,GABHS扁桃体咽炎的细菌学确诊,随机分配接受口服头孢菌素或青霉素抗生素治疗10天,并在治疗后使用咽拭子培养评估细菌学结果。主要关注的结局为细菌学和临床治愈率。进行敏感性分析以评估详细的临床疾病描述、依从性监测、GABHS血清分型、排除GABHS携带者以及治愈检测访视时间的影响。
荟萃分析纳入了35项涉及7125例患者的试验。与青霉素相比,细菌学治愈率的总体汇总比值比(OR)显著支持头孢菌素(OR:3.02;95%置信区间[CI]:2.49 - 3.67,各头孢菌素[头孢氨苄、头孢羟氨苄、头孢呋辛、头孢泊肟酯、头孢丙烯、头孢克肟、头孢布烯和头孢地尼]显示出更高的细菌学治愈率)。临床治愈率的总体汇总OR为2.33(95% CI:1.84 - 2.97),同样显著支持相同的各头孢菌素。与20世纪70年代、80年代和90年代发表的试验相比,随着时间推移青霉素的细菌治愈率有下降趋势。当试验按双盲分组(OR:2.31;95% CI:1.39 - 3.85)、高质量(OR:2.50;95% CI:1.85 - 3.36)、临床状态明确(OR:2.12;95% CI:1.54 - 2.90)、有详细依从性监测(OR:2.85;95% CI:2.33 - 3.47)、有GABHS血清分型(OR:3.10;95% CI:2.42 - 3.98)、排除携带者(OR:2.51;95% CI:1.55 - 4.08)以及治疗后3至14天进行治愈检测(OR:3.53;95% CI:2.75 - 4.54)分组时,细菌治愈的敏感性分析显著支持头孢菌素治疗优于青霉素治疗。对三代头孢菌素的比较细菌学治愈率分析未显示差异。
该荟萃分析表明,与口服青霉素相比,开具口服头孢菌素时,GABHS扁桃体咽炎细菌学和临床治疗失败的可能性显著降低。