Chaloulakou Archontoula, Saisana Michaela, Spyrellis Nikolas
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Heroon Polytechniou 9, Zografou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Sci Total Environ. 2003 Sep 1;313(1-3):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00335-8.
A comparison study has been performed with neural networks (NNs) and multiple linear regression models to forecast the next day's maximum hourly ozone concentration in the Athens basin at four representative monitoring stations that show very different behavior. All models use 11 predictors (eight meteorological and three persistence variables) and are developed and validated between April and October from 1992 to 1999. Performance results based on a wide set of forecast quality measures indicate that the NNs provide better estimates of ozone concentrations at the monitoring sites, whilst the more often used linear models are less efficient at accurately forecasting high ozone concentrations. The violation of the European information threshold of 180 microg/m(3) is successfully predicted by the NN in 72% of the cases on average. Results at all stations are consistent with similar ozone forecast studies using NNs in other European cities.
已对神经网络(NNs)和多元线性回归模型进行了一项比较研究,以预测雅典盆地四个具有非常不同特征的代表性监测站次日的每小时最高臭氧浓度。所有模型均使用11个预测变量(八个气象变量和三个持续性变量),并在1992年至1999年的4月至10月期间进行开发和验证。基于一系列广泛的预测质量指标的性能结果表明,神经网络能更好地估计监测站点的臭氧浓度,而更常用的线性模型在准确预测高臭氧浓度方面效率较低。神经网络平均在72%的情况下成功预测了违反欧洲180微克/立方米信息阈值的情况。所有站点的结果与在其他欧洲城市使用神经网络进行的类似臭氧预测研究一致。