Quiles J, García-Fernández M A, Almeida P B, Pérez-David E, Bermejo J, Moreno M, Avanzas P
Non-invasive Cardiology Laboratory, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Heart. 2003 Sep;89(9):1014-8. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.9.1014.
There is evidence that new portable echocardiographic devices are useful in evaluating heart anatomy and function, but a lack of Doppler modes has up to now been an important limitation in obtaining haemodynamic data.
To report the Doppler capabilities of a new hand held echocardiographic device.
Blinded comparison of two types of echocardiography machine.
Tertiary care centre.
98 consecutive patients were randomly imaged with the hand held device, with a standard platform as reference.
Pulsed wave transmitral Doppler inflow tract velocities, deceleration time, and continuous wave Doppler measurements of aortic ejection and tricuspid regurgitation peak velocities were recorded.
There was excellent agreement between the hand held device and standard echocardiography for the evaluation of diastolic E and A waves, E/A ratio, and deceleration time with pulsed wave Doppler (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.97, 0.93, 0.90, and 0.78, respectively). In addition, good agreement was found between continuous wave Doppler measurements of aortic ejection and tricuspid regurgitation velocities (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.80). However, there was a significant difference between patients with tricuspid regurgitation measured with the hand held device (25.5%) and by standard echocardiography (65.3%), resulting in misdiagnosis of eight patients with pronounced pulmonary hypertension.
New hand held devices with Doppler capabilities overcome previous limitations in evaluating haemodynamic variables. With colour Doppler they are now suitable for the complete evaluation of valvar disease and diastolic function. However, important limitations remain in the evaluation of pulmonary pressures.
有证据表明,新型便携式超声心动图设备在评估心脏解剖结构和功能方面很有用,但迄今为止,缺乏多普勒模式一直是获取血流动力学数据的一个重要限制。
报告一种新型手持式超声心动图设备的多普勒功能。
两种超声心动图机器的盲法比较。
三级护理中心。
连续98例患者用手持式设备进行随机成像,以标准平台作为参考。
记录脉冲波经二尖瓣多普勒流入道速度、减速时间以及主动脉射血和三尖瓣反流峰值速度的连续波多普勒测量值。
在评估舒张期E波和A波、E/A比值以及脉冲波多普勒的减速时间方面,手持式设备与标准超声心动图之间具有极好的一致性(组内相关系数分别为0.97、0.93、0.90和0.78)。此外,在主动脉射血和三尖瓣反流速度的连续波多普勒测量方面也发现了良好的一致性(组内相关系数分别为0.96和0.80)。然而,手持式设备测量的三尖瓣反流患者(25.5%)与标准超声心动图测量的患者(65.3%)之间存在显著差异,导致8例重度肺动脉高压患者被误诊。
具有多普勒功能的新型手持式设备克服了以往在评估血流动力学变量方面的局限性。有了彩色多普勒,它们现在适用于瓣膜疾病和舒张功能的全面评估。然而,在评估肺动脉压力方面仍然存在重要局限性。