• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者长期输注舒芬太尼镇静的药代动力学

Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients.

作者信息

Ethuin Frédéric, Boudaoud Said, Leblanc Isabelle, Troje Christian, Marie Olivier, Levron Jean-Claude, Le Moing Jean-Pierre, Assoune Patrice, Eurin Benoit, Jacob Laurent

机构信息

Réanimation chirurgicale, Département d'Anesthésie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475, Paris cedex 10, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1920-y. Epub 2003 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-003-1920-y
PMID:12923616
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetics of long-term infusion of sufentanil in ICU patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Open-label study in a surgical intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Ten consecutive patients without renal or hepatic failure requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 6 days.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received sufentanil (initial bolus 0.5 micro g/kg and continuous infusion rate of 0.5 micro g/kg per hour) and midazolam (initial bolus 0.08 mg/kg and continuous infusion 0.05 mg/kg per hour). Sedation was adjusted according to the Ramsay scale (score >3). Blood samples were taken during and up to 72 h after the infusion, and plasma concentrations were measured using a sensitive radioimmunoassay method.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Plasma concentration-time profiles of sufentanil and pharmacokinetic parameters such as initial postinfusion half-life (t(1/2alpha)), elimination half-life (t(1/2beta)), total clearance (Cl), volume of distribution (Vdbeta), and time required to obtain a 50% decrease in plasma concentration (tcp(0/2)). The mean duration of sedation was 12+/-7 days. The initial half-life t(1/2alpha) was 1.33+/-1.15 h. The observed prolonged elimination half-life (t(1/2beta)=25.5+/-9.4 h) was related to the large volume of distribution (Vdbeta=22.6+/-9.4 l/kg). The mean total clearance was 13.4+/-7.0 ml/kg per minute. The mean time required to obtain a 50% decrease in plasma concentration was short (tcp(0/2=)4.7+/-3.7 h).

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic analysis of sufentanil for ICU sedation revealed increased volume of distribution and elimination half-life. Nevertheless the rapid distribution and elimination processes suggest that the rapid reversibility of sedation with sufentanil is maintained after long duration of infusion. Further studies should be carried out to evaluate the clinical relevance of these results.

摘要

目的

确定在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中长期输注舒芬太尼的药代动力学。

设计与地点

在外科重症监护病房进行的开放标签研究。

患者

连续10例无肾或肝功能衰竭且需要机械通气至少6天的患者。

干预措施

患者接受舒芬太尼(初始推注剂量为0.5μg/kg,持续输注速率为每小时0.5μg/kg)和咪达唑仑(初始推注剂量为0.08mg/kg,持续输注速率为每小时0.05mg/kg)。根据拉姆齐评分(评分>3)调整镇静水平。在输注期间及输注后72小时内采集血样,并使用灵敏的放射免疫分析法测量血浆浓度。

测量与结果

舒芬太尼的血浆浓度-时间曲线以及药代动力学参数,如输注后初始半衰期(t(1/2α))、消除半衰期(t(1/2β))、总清除率(Cl)、分布容积(Vdbeta)以及血浆浓度降低50%所需的时间(tcp(0/2))。平均镇静持续时间为12±7天。初始半衰期t(1/2α)为1.33±1.15小时。观察到的消除半衰期延长(t(1/2β)=25.5±9.4小时)与较大的分布容积(Vdbeta=22.6±9.4升/千克)有关。平均总清除率为每分钟13.4±7.0毫升/千克。血浆浓度降低50%所需的平均时间较短(tcp(0/2)=4.7±3.7小时)。

结论

对用于ICU镇静的舒芬太尼进行的药代动力学分析显示分布容积和消除半衰期增加。然而,快速的分布和消除过程表明,在长时间输注后,舒芬太尼镇静的快速可逆性得以维持。应开展进一步研究以评估这些结果的临床相关性。

相似文献

1
Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients.重症监护病房患者长期输注舒芬太尼镇静的药代动力学
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1920-y. Epub 2003 Aug 16.
2
[Level concept of analgesic dosing in intensive care medicine with sufentanil].[舒芬太尼在重症医学中的镇痛给药剂量分级概念]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1998 Jan;33(1):8-26.
3
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol/alfentanil infusions for sedation in ICU patients.丙泊酚/阿芬太尼输注用于ICU患者镇静的药代动力学和药效学
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Dec;21(12):981-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01700659.
4
[Sedation in ICU: from clinical research to daily practice].[重症监护病房中的镇静:从临床研究到日常实践]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005 May;24(5):466-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.04.004.
5
[Remifentanil-midazolam compared to sufentanil-midazolam for ICU long-term sedation].瑞芬太尼-咪达唑仑与舒芬太尼-咪达唑仑用于重症监护病房长期镇静的比较
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005 May;24(5):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.02.027. Epub 2005 Apr 8.
6
Altered Pharmacokinetics in Prolonged Infusions of Sedatives and Analgesics Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.在成年危重症患者中长时间输注镇静和镇痛药物时的药代动力学改变:系统评价。
Clin Ther. 2018 Sep;40(9):1598-1615.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
7
The 90% effective dose of a sufentanil bolus for the management of painful positioning in intubated patients in the ICU.在 ICU 中,用于处理插管患者疼痛体位的舒芬太尼推注的 90%有效剂量。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jun;29(6):280-5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328352234d.
8
Infusion of propofol, sufentanil, or midazolam for sedation after aortic surgery: comparison of oxygen consumption and hemodynamic stability.主动脉手术后输注丙泊酚、舒芬太尼或咪达唑仑进行镇静:氧耗量与血流动力学稳定性的比较。
Anesth Analg. 1998 Aug;87(2):272-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00007.
9
Continuous infusion of lorazepam versus medazolam in patients in the intensive care unit: sedation with lorazepam is easier to manage and is more cost-effective.重症监护病房患者持续输注劳拉西泮与咪达唑仑的比较:使用劳拉西泮进行镇静更易于管理且更具成本效益。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1461-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00009.
10
Respiratory depression under long-term sedation with sufentanil, midazolam and clonidine has no clinical significance.长期使用舒芬太尼、咪达唑仑和可乐定镇静时出现的呼吸抑制并无临床意义。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1454-61. doi: 10.1007/s001340000637.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacokinetics of Sufentanil After Epidural Administration During the Course of Extensive Abdominal Surgery.大手术期间硬膜外给予舒芬太尼的药代动力学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01543-y.
2
Pharmacokinetics of Opioid Infusions in the Adult Intensive Care Unit Setting-A Systematic Review.成人重症监护病房中阿片类药物输注的药代动力学——一项系统评价
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Mar;64(3):323-334. doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01490-8. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
3
Utilization of pain and sedation therapy on noninvasive mechanical ventilation in Korean intensive care units: a multi-center prospective observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Remifentanil vs morphine for patients in intensive care unit who need short-term mechanical ventilation.瑞芬太尼与吗啡用于需要短期机械通气的重症监护病房患者的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Sep;85 Suppl 3:S848-57.
2
Recovery after remifentanil and sufentanil for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated patients after trauma or major surgery.瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼用于创伤或大手术后机械通气患者镇痛和镇静后的恢复情况。
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;86(6):763-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.6.763.
3
Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey.
韩国重症监护病房中疼痛与镇静治疗在无创机械通气中的应用:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Acute Crit Care. 2020 Nov;35(4):255-262. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00164. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous sufentanil in critically ill patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy.接受体外膜肺氧合治疗的危重症患者静脉注射舒芬太尼的群体药代动力学。
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 9;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2508-4.
5
Dose determination of sufentanil for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with background infusion in abdominal surgeries: A random study.舒芬太尼用于腹部手术患者静脉自控镇痛时背景输注的剂量确定:一项随机研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 17;13(10):e0205959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205959. eCollection 2018.
6
Monitoring of sedation depth in intensive care unit by therapeutic drug monitoring? A prospective observation study of medical intensive care patients.通过治疗药物监测来监测重症监护病房的镇静深度?一项针对医学重症监护患者的前瞻性观察研究。
J Intensive Care. 2018 Sep 14;6:62. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0331-7. eCollection 2018.
7
Conscious sedation for balloon mitral valvotomy: A comparison of fentanyl versus sufentanil.用于球囊二尖瓣成形术的清醒镇静:芬太尼与舒芬太尼的比较。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):163-168. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.203930.
8
[Special aspects of analgosedation in cardiogenic shock patients].[心源性休克患者镇痛镇静的特殊方面]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Feb;111(1):22-8. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0131-y. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
9
The effect of sufentanil administration on remifentanil-based anaesthesia during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.舒芬太尼给药对腹腔镜妇科手术中瑞芬太尼麻醉效果的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:701329. doi: 10.1155/2014/701329. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
The pain, agitation, and delirium practice guidelines for adult critically ill patients: a post-publication perspective.成人危重症患者疼痛、躁动和谵妄处理临床实践指南:发布后视角。
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Apr 2;3(1):9. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-9.
重症监护病房中的镇静与镇痛实践:一项欧洲调查的结果
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Aug;87(2):186-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.2.186.
4
No reduction in the sufentanil requirement of elderly patients undergoing ventilatory support in the medical intensive care unit.在医学重症监护病房接受通气支持的老年患者对舒芬太尼的需求量没有减少。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Oct;16(10):702-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00569.x.
5
Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensive care unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens.重症监护病房中咪达唑仑镇静的并发症及与其他镇静方案的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1998 May;26(5):947-56. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199805000-00034.
6
[Level concept of analgesic dosing in intensive care medicine with sufentanil].[舒芬太尼在重症医学中的镇痛给药剂量分级概念]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1998 Jan;33(1):8-26.
7
Recovery from opioid anesthesia: the clinical implication of context-sensitive half-times.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):184-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00036.
8
Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil.舒芬太尼的药代动力学线性及模型估计
Anesthesiology. 1995 Dec;83(6):1194-204. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199512000-00010.
9
Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in general surgical patients under different conditions of anaesthesia.不同麻醉条件下舒芬太尼在普通外科手术患者中的药代动力学
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Feb;37(2):176-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03696.x.
10
A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.基于一项欧洲/北美多中心研究的新型简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)。
JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957.