Gepts E, Shafer S L, Camu F, Stanski D R, Woestenborghs R, Van Peer A, Heykants J J
Department of Anesthesiology, Flemish Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
Anesthesiology. 1995 Dec;83(6):1194-204. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199512000-00010.
The pharmacokinetic profiles of sufentanil available in the literature are conflicting because of methodologic differences. Length of sampling and assay sensitivity are key factors involved in accurately estimating the volumes of distribution, clearances, and elimination phase. The unit disposition function of increasing doses of sufentanil were investigated and the influence of dose administered on the linearity of pharmacokinetics was assessed.
The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil were investigated in 23 patients, aged 14-68 yr, scheduled for surgery with postoperative ventilation. After induction of anesthesia, sufentanil was administered as a short infusion (10-20 min) in doses ranging from 250 micrograms to 1,500 micrograms. Frequent arterial blood samples were gathered during and at the end of infusion, then at specific intervals up to 48 h after infusion. Plasma concentrations of sufentanil were measured by radioimmunoassay (limit of sensitivity 0.02 ng.ml-1). The data were analyzed with the standard two-stage, naive pooled-data and the mixed effect pharmacokinetic approaches.
The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil were adequately described by a linear three-compartmental mamillary model with the following parameters, expressed as log mean values with 95% confidence intervals: the central volume of distribution = 14.3 l (13.1-15.41), the rapidly equilibrating volume = 63.1 l (61.9-64.3 l), the slowly equilibrating volume = 261.6 l (260.2-262.9 l), the steady-state distribution volume = 339 l (335-343 l), metabolic clearance = 0.92 l.min-1 (0.84-1.05 l.min-1), rapid distribution clearance = 1.55 l.min-1 (1.34-2.14 l.min-1), slow distribution clearance = 0.33 l.min-1 (0.27-0.49 l.min-1), and elimination half-life = 769 min (690-1011 min). No relation to age, weight, or lean body mass was found for any of the parameters.
Sufentanil pharmacokinetics were linear within the dose range studied. Drug detection up to 24 h after dosing was necessary to define the terminal elimination phase. The metabolic clearance approached liver blood flow and a large volume of distribution was identified, consistent with the long terminal elimination half-life. Simulations predicted that plasma sufentanil steady-state concentrations would rapidly decline after termination of an infusion despite the long half-lives.
由于方法学差异,文献中关于舒芬太尼的药代动力学特征存在矛盾。采样时长和检测灵敏度是准确估算分布容积、清除率和消除相的关键因素。研究了递增剂量舒芬太尼的单位处置函数,并评估了给药剂量对药代动力学线性的影响。
对23例年龄在14 - 68岁、计划接受术后通气手术的患者进行舒芬太尼药代动力学研究。麻醉诱导后,以短时间输注(10 - 20分钟)的方式给予舒芬太尼,剂量范围为250微克至1500微克。在输注期间和结束时频繁采集动脉血样,然后在输注后长达48小时的特定间隔时间采集血样。采用放射免疫分析法测定血浆舒芬太尼浓度(灵敏度限值为0.02纳克/毫升)。数据采用标准两阶段、原始汇总数据和混合效应药代动力学方法进行分析。
舒芬太尼的药代动力学可用线性三室乳头状模型充分描述,其参数以对数均值表示并带有95%置信区间:中央分布容积 = 14.3升(13.1 - 15.41升),快速平衡容积 = 63.1升(61.9 - 64.3升),缓慢平衡容积 = 261.6升(260.2 - 262.9升),稳态分布容积 = 339升(335 - 343升),代谢清除率 = 0.92升/分钟(0.84 - 1.05升/分钟),快速分布清除率 = 1.55升/分钟(1.34 - 2.14升/分钟),缓慢分布清除率 = 0.33升/分钟(0.27 - 0.49升/分钟),消除半衰期 = 769分钟(690 - 1011分钟)。未发现任何参数与年龄、体重或瘦体重有关。
在所研究的剂量范围内,舒芬太尼的药代动力学呈线性。给药后长达24小时的药物检测对于确定终末消除相是必要的。代谢清除率接近肝血流量,且确定分布容积较大,这与较长的终末消除半衰期一致。模拟预测,尽管半衰期较长,但输注终止后血浆舒芬太尼稳态浓度将迅速下降。