Jones Matt, Sieck Winston R
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jul;29(4):626-40. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.626.
Recency effects (REs) have been well established in memory and probability learning paradigms but have received little attention in category earning research. Extant categorization models predict REs to be unaffected by learning, whereas a functional interpretation of REs, suggested by results in other domains, predicts that people are able to learn sequential dependencies and incorporate this information into their responses. These contrasting predictions were tested in 2 experiments involving a classification task in which outcome sequences were autocorrelated. Experiment 1 showed that reliance on recent outcomes adapts to the structure of the task, in contrast to models' predictions. Experiment 2 provided constraints on how sequential information is learned and suggested possible extensions to current models to account for this learning.
近因效应(REs)在记忆和概率学习范式中已得到充分证实,但在类别学习研究中却很少受到关注。现有的分类模型预测近因效应不受学习的影响,而其他领域的研究结果所暗示的对近因效应的功能解释则预测,人们能够学习序列依赖性并将此信息纳入他们的反应中。在涉及结果序列具有自相关性的分类任务的两项实验中,对这些相互矛盾的预测进行了检验。实验1表明,与模型的预测相反,对近期结果的依赖会适应任务的结构。实验2对序列信息的学习方式提供了限制,并提出了对当前模型可能的扩展,以解释这种学习。