Minda John Paul, Ross Brian H
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1355-68. doi: 10.3758/bf03206326.
Categories are learned in many ways, but studies of category learning have generally focused on classification learning. This focus may limit the understanding of categorization processes. Two experiments were conducted in which participants learned categories of animals by predicting how much food each animal would eat. We refer to this as indirect category learning, because the task andthe feedback were not directly related to category membership, yet category learning was necessary for good performance in the task. In the first experiment, we compared the performance of participants who learned the categories indirectly with the performance of participants who first learned to classify the objects. In the second experiment, we replicated the basic findings and examined attention to different features during the learning task. In both experiments, participants who learned in the prediction-only condition displayed a broader distribution of attention than participants who learned in the classification-and-prediction condition did. Some participants in the prediction-only group learned the family resemblance structure of the categories, even when a perfect criterial attribute was present. In contrast, participants who first learned to classify the objects tended to learn the criterial attribute.
类别可以通过多种方式习得,但类别学习的研究通常集中在分类学习上。这种关注点可能会限制对分类过程的理解。我们进行了两项实验,让参与者通过预测每只动物会吃多少食物来学习动物类别。我们将此称为间接类别学习,因为任务和反馈与类别成员身份没有直接关系,但类别学习对于在任务中表现良好是必要的。在第一个实验中,我们将间接学习类别的参与者的表现与首先学习对物体进行分类的参与者的表现进行了比较。在第二个实验中,我们重复了基本发现,并研究了学习任务期间对不同特征的关注情况。在这两个实验中,仅在预测条件下学习的参与者比在分类和预测条件下学习的参与者表现出更广泛的注意力分布。仅在预测组中的一些参与者学习了类别的家族相似性结构,即使存在完美的标准属性。相比之下,首先学习对物体进行分类的参与者倾向于学习标准属性。