Wozniak Katarzyna, Kazama Takashi, Kowalewski Cezary
Departments of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Arch Dermatol. 2003 Aug;139(8):1007-11. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.8.1007.
To develop a practical technique to distinguish autoimmune subepidermal bullous diseases.
A prospective study.
Academic referral center-the Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw. Patients Forty-two patients fulfilling clinical, immunological, and/or immunoelectron microscopic criteria for bullous pemphigoid (n = 31), mucous membrane pemphigoid (n = 6), or epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (n = 5), diagnosed as having disease and treated from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2002.
We applied laser scanning confocal microscopy to determine the localization of in vivo-bound IgG at the basement membrane zone in biopsy specimens taken from patients' skin to compare the localization of basement membrane zone markers: antibody against beta4 integrin, antibody against laminin 5, and antibody against type IV collagen. In vivo-bound IgG was visualized by labeling with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-human IgG antibody, whereas basement membrane zone markers were labeled with anti-mouse Cy5-conjugated antibodies.
In patients with bullous pemphigoid, in vivo-bound IgG was localized on the epidermal side of laminin 5 and co-localized with beta4 integrin. In patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid, IgG was in vivo bound to the dermal-epidermal junction between localization of laminin 5 and type IV collagen. In patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, in vivo-bound IgG was present on the dermal side of type IV collagen.
Laser scanning confocal microscopy allows precise localization of in vivo-bound IgG in patients' skin and, thus, it is a rapid method for the differentiation of mucous membrane pemphigoid from bullous pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. This tool is suitable for the routine diagnosis of individual patients and for retrospective studies. This method is of special value in those patients in whom circulating autoantibodies are not detectable.
开发一种区分自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病的实用技术。
一项前瞻性研究。
学术转诊中心——华沙医科大学皮肤科。患者42例符合大疱性类天疱疮(n = 31)、黏膜类天疱疮(n = 6)或获得性大疱性表皮松解症(n = 5)临床、免疫学和/或免疫电镜标准的患者,于1997年1月1日至2002年12月31日被诊断患有疾病并接受治疗。
我们应用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜来确定取自患者皮肤活检标本中体内结合的IgG在基底膜带的定位,以比较基底膜带标志物的定位:抗β4整合素抗体、抗层粘连蛋白5抗体和抗IV型胶原抗体。体内结合的IgG通过用异硫氰酸荧光素偶联的抗人IgG抗体标记来可视化,而基底膜带标志物用抗小鼠Cy5偶联抗体标记。
在大疱性类天疱疮患者中,体内结合的IgG定位于层粘连蛋白5的表皮侧并与β4整合素共定位。在黏膜类天疱疮患者中,IgG在体内定位于层粘连蛋白5和IV型胶原定位之间的真皮 - 表皮交界处。在获得性大疱性表皮松解症患者中,体内结合的IgG存在于IV型胶原的真皮侧。
激光扫描共聚焦显微镜可精确确定患者皮肤中体内结合的IgG的定位,因此是一种区分黏膜类天疱疮与大疱性类天疱疮和获得性大疱性表皮松解症的快速方法。该工具适用于个体患者的常规诊断和回顾性研究。该方法在那些无法检测到循环自身抗体的患者中具有特殊价值。