Heise Michael, Krüger Ulf, Rückert Ralph, Rad Fereshteh, Scholz Hans, Neuhaus Peter, Settmacher Utz
Department of Surgery, Charité, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep;17(5):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s10016-003-0043-9. Epub 2003 Aug 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between peripheral runoff estimated by the SVS/ISCVS scoring system and intraoperatively measured outflow. Sixty-six patients received 27 femoropopliteal and 39 femorocrural ePTFE grafts. During the operation, peripheral resistance and hydraulic impedance were measured by means of the extracorporeal-bypass-flow method. Angiographic runoff was estimated according to the revised SVS/ISCVS system. Patients were entered in a graft surveillance program and patency was calculated after 3 years. The relation between the angiographic runoff score and graft patency as well as correlations between hemodynamic data, peripheral resistance, and hydraulic impedance were calculated. Primary and secondary patency rates for femoropopliteal grafts were 44% and 60% and those for femorocrural bypasses were 35% and 45%. Mean angiographic vessel diameters for above-knee and below-knee popliteal arteries were 0.51 +/- 0.02 mm and 0.47 +/- 0.04 mm. Diameters of crural arteries were 0.34 +/- 0.03 mm (posterior tibial artery), 0.27 +/- 0.02 mm (anterior tibial artery) and 0.26 +/- 0.21 mm (peroneal artery). The differences in diameter between popliteal and crural grafts were statistically significant ( p < 0.01). Calculated correlations between the preoperative score and hemodynamic, resistance, and impedance values or patency rates were generally poor and statistically not significant. A statistical significant correlation was found only between SVS/ISCVS score and recipient vessel diameters. The angiographic runoff did not correlate with peripheral resistance, impedance, or patency rates. Patients with angiographically poor outflow should additionally be evaluated with duplex sonography or magnetic resonance angiography and should not be denied peripheral reconstructions.
本研究的目的是评估由SVS/ISCVS评分系统估算的外周血流与术中测量的流出道之间的相关性。66例患者接受了27例股腘动脉和39例股胫动脉ePTFE移植物。手术期间,采用体外循环血流法测量外周阻力和水力阻抗。根据修订后的SVS/ISCVS系统估算血管造影血流。患者进入移植物监测计划,并在3年后计算通畅率。计算血管造影血流评分与移植物通畅率之间的关系,以及血流动力学数据、外周阻力和水力阻抗之间的相关性。股腘动脉移植物的一期和二期通畅率分别为44%和60%,股胫动脉旁路移植术的通畅率分别为35%和45%。膝上和膝下腘动脉的平均血管造影血管直径分别为0.51±0.02mm和0.47±0.04mm。胫动脉直径为0.34±0.03mm(胫后动脉)、0.27±0.02mm(胫前动脉)和0.26±0.21mm(腓动脉)。腘动脉和胫动脉移植物之间的直径差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。术前评分与血流动力学、阻力、阻抗值或通畅率之间计算出的相关性通常较差,且无统计学意义。仅在SVS/ISCVS评分与受体血管直径之间发现了统计学显著相关性。血管造影血流与外周阻力、阻抗或通畅率无关。血管造影流出道差的患者应另外接受双功超声或磁共振血管造影评估,不应被拒绝进行外周血管重建。