Suppr超能文献

在正常家庭活动下进行低流量、长期空气采样,以测量屋尘螨和蟑螂过敏原。

Low-flow, long-term air sampling under normal domestic activity to measure house dust mite and cockroach allergens.

作者信息

Park Jung Won, Kim Cheol Woo, Kang Dae Bong, Lee In Young, Choi Soo Young, Yong Tai-Soon, Shin Dong Cheon, Kim Kyu Earn, Hong Chein-Soo

机构信息

Institute of Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2002;12(4):293-8.

Abstract

Successful applications of air sampling for the quantification of exposure to indoor allergens have been reported, but its efficiency is still controversial. We evaluated whether the low-flow, long-term air sampling in normal domestic activity conditions can quantify the exposure of house dust mites (HDM) and cockroaches (CR) allergens or not. Airborne Der f 1 and Bla g 1 were captured with a personal air sampler in 25 bedrooms during normal domestic activity. Quantification of the major allergens in the reservoir dust and the extraction of the air sampler filters were done with two-site ELISA kits. Airborne Der f 1 was measured above the threshold level of detection in 15 houses (60%). Detection rate of airborne Der f 1 was significantly higher in those houses where D. farinae was microscopically found in the reservoir dusts (76.5% vs. 25%, chi 2 = 6.0, p = 0.014). Airborne Der f 1 was more frequently detected in the houses with higher Der f 1 (> or = 10 micrograms/g dust) in bedding reservoir dust than the other group (91% vs. 35.7%, chi 2 = 7.819, p = 0.005), and the median value of airborne Der f 1 was also significantly higher in that group (14.0 pg/m3 vs. below detection limit, p = 0.002). Airborne Der f 1 was significantly correlated with Der f 1 in bedding reservoir dust (r = 0.591, p < 0.01). Airborne Bla g 1 was measured with ELISA in 16 houses (64%), and it was more frequently detected in the houses where the CRs were captured by adhesive traps (91% vs. 57%, chi 2 = 3,484, p = 0.06). The median concentration of Bla g 1 in the filter was also higher in the houses with captured CRs (0.12 vs. 0.05 mU/m3, p = 0.06), but the level of Bla g 1 did not correlate with that of the bedding dusts or the floor dusts of kitchen. These results suggested that airborne HDM or CR allergens could be measured by low-flow, long-term air sampling, and that it might be one of appropriate modalities for evaluating personal exposure to HDM and CR allergens.

摘要

已有报告称空气采样在量化室内过敏原暴露方面的应用取得了成功,但其效率仍存在争议。我们评估了在正常家庭活动条件下进行的低流量、长期空气采样能否量化屋尘螨(HDM)和蟑螂(CR)过敏原的暴露情况。在正常家庭活动期间,使用个人空气采样器在25间卧室中采集空气中的Der f 1和Bla g 1。使用双位点ELISA试剂盒对储尘中的主要过敏原进行定量,并对空气采样器过滤器进行提取。在15间房屋(60%)中检测到空气中的Der f 1高于检测阈值水平。在储尘中显微镜下发现粉尘螨的房屋中,空气中Der f 1的检出率显著更高(76.5%对25%,χ2 = 6.0,p = 0.014)。与其他组相比,在床垫储尘中Der f 1含量较高(≥10微克/克粉尘)的房屋中,空气中Der f 1更常被检测到(91%对35.7%,χ2 = 7.819,p = 0.005),且该组中空气中Der f 1的中位数也显著更高(14.0皮克/立方米对低于检测限,p = 0.002)。空气中的Der f 1与床垫储尘中的Der f 1显著相关(r = 0.591,p < 0.01)。通过ELISA在16间房屋(64%)中检测到空气中的Bla g 1,在通过粘性捕集器捕获到蟑螂的房屋中更常检测到(91%对57%,χ2 = 3.484,p = 0.06)。在捕获到蟑螂的房屋中,过滤器中Bla g 1的中位数浓度也更高(0.12对0.05毫单位/立方米,p = 0.06),但Bla g 1的水平与床垫灰尘或厨房地板灰尘的水平无关。这些结果表明,空气中的HDM或CR过敏原可以通过低流量、长期空气采样进行测量,并且它可能是评估个人对HDM和CR过敏原暴露的合适方式之一。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验