Southwick L M, Grigg B C, Fouss J L, Kornecki T S
USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Research Unit, 4115 Gourrier Ave., Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Aug 27;51(18):5355-61. doi: 10.1021/jf034049a.
Atrazine and metolachlor are commonly detected in surface water bodies in southern Louisiana. These herbicides are frequently applied in combination to corn, and atrazine to sugarcane, in this region. A study was conducted on the runoff of atrazine and metolachlor from 0.21 ha plots planted to corn on Commerce silt loam, a Mississippi River alluvial soil. The study, carried out over a three-year period characterized by rainfall close to the 30-year average, provided data on persistence in the surface soil (top 2.5 cm layer) and in the runoff active zone of the soil, as measured by decrease in runoff concentrations with time after application. Regression equations were developed that allow an estimate of the runoff extraction coefficients for each herbicide. Atrazine showed soil half-lives in the range 10.5-17.3 days, and metolachlor exhibited half-lives from 15.8-28.0 days. Concentrations in successive runoff events declined much faster than those in the surface soil layer: Atrazine runoff concentrations decreased over successive runoff events with a half-life from 0.6 to 5.7 days, and metolachlor in runoff was characterized by half-lives of 0.6-6.4 days. That is, half-lives of the two herbicides in the runoff-active zone were one-tenth to one-half as long as the respective half-lives in the surface soil layer. Within years, the half-lives of these herbicides in the runoff active zone varied from two-thirds longer for metolachlor in 1996 to one-fifth longer for atrazine in 1995. The equations relating runoff concentrations of atrazine and metolachlor to soil concentrations contain extraction coefficients of 0.009. Losses in runoff for atrazine were 5.2-10.8% of applied, and for metolachlor they were 3.7-8.0%; atrazine losses in runoff were 20-40% higher than those for metolachlor. These relatively high percent of application losses indicate the importance of practices that reduce runoff of these chemicals from alluvial soils of southern Louisiana.
阿特拉津和异丙甲草胺在路易斯安那州南部的地表水体中普遍被检测到。在该地区,这些除草剂经常被混合用于玉米种植,阿特拉津还被用于甘蔗种植。在密西西比河冲积土——商业粉质壤土上,对种植玉米的0.21公顷地块中阿特拉津和异丙甲草胺的径流情况进行了一项研究。这项为期三年的研究期间降雨接近30年平均水平,提供了关于这两种除草剂在表层土壤(顶部2.5厘米土层)和土壤径流活跃区持久性的数据,通过施用后随时间径流浓度的降低来衡量。建立了回归方程,用于估算每种除草剂的径流提取系数。阿特拉津在土壤中的半衰期为10.5 - 17.3天,异丙甲草胺的半衰期为15.8 - 28.0天。连续径流事件中的浓度下降速度比表层土壤层中的快得多:阿特拉津径流浓度在连续径流事件中下降,半衰期为0.6至5.7天,异丙甲草胺径流的半衰期为0.6 - 6.4天。也就是说,这两种除草剂在径流活跃区的半衰期分别是表层土壤层各自半衰期的十分之一到二分之一。在不同年份中,这些除草剂在径流活跃区的半衰期变化范围为,1996年异丙甲草胺比其在表层土壤层中的半衰期长三分之二,1995年阿特拉津比其在表层土壤层中的半衰期长五分之一。将阿特拉津和异丙甲草胺径流浓度与土壤浓度相关联的方程中的提取系数为0.009。阿特拉津径流损失占施用量的5.2 - 10.8%,异丙甲草胺为3.7 - 8.0%;阿特拉津的径流损失比异丙甲草胺高20 - 40%。这些相对较高的施用损失百分比表明,采取措施减少这些化学物质从路易斯安那州南部冲积土中的径流非常重要。