Chintala Kavitha, Turner Daniel R, Leaman Stephanie, Rodriguez-Cruz Edwin, Wynne Joshua, Greenbaum Adam, Forbes Thomas J
Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Sep;60(1):101-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10603.
CardioSEAL device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been advocated for the treatment of patients with cryptogenic stroke. Using the standard delivery technique, partial deployment of the CardioSEAL device can occur, especially in patients with a thick septum secundum and/or long PFO tunnel. We hypothesized that using a left atrial-to-right atrial balloon pull-through to make the septum primum incompetent would result in improved final device position regardless of septal thickness or tunnel length. Catheterization reports, cineangiograms, and transesophageal echocardiograms of 51 patients who underwent CardioSEAL device closure of PFO between March 2000 and August 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Group 1 (n = 21) included patients with CardioSEAL placement using the standard technique and group 2 (n = 30) included patients with CardioSEAL placement using the balloon pull-through technique. There were no differences between the groups in terms of age (43.6 vs. 45.3 years; P = NS), weight (83.3 vs. 89.9 kg; P = NS), septum secundum thickness (6.4 vs. 7.0 mm; P = NS), PFO tunnel length (15.5 vs. 13.1 mm; P = NS), or device size. In group 1, 4/21 (19%) had partial deployment of the CardioSEAL device, while in group 2, no partial CardioSEAL deployment (0/30) was observed. No complications were associated with the balloon pull-through technique. We conclude that the left atrial-to-right atrial balloon pull-through technique is safe and may allow for better final position of the CardioSEAL device during PFO closure.
已有人主张使用CardioSEAL装置闭合卵圆孔未闭(PFO)来治疗不明原因卒中患者。采用标准输送技术时,CardioSEAL装置可能会出现部分展开的情况,尤其是在继发隔较厚和/或PFO隧道较长的患者中。我们推测,使用从左心房到右心房的球囊牵拉使原发隔失去功能,无论间隔厚度或隧道长度如何,都能改善装置的最终位置。回顾性分析了2000年3月至2002年8月期间51例行CardioSEAL装置闭合PFO患者的导管检查报告、血管造影电影图像和经食管超声心动图。第1组(n = 21)包括采用标准技术放置CardioSEAL装置的患者,第2组(n = 30)包括采用球囊牵拉技术放置CardioSEAL装置的患者。两组在年龄(43.6岁对45.3岁;P = 无显著性差异)、体重(83.3 kg对89.9 kg;P = 无显著性差异)、继发隔厚度(6.4 mm对7.0 mm;P = 无显著性差异)、PFO隧道长度(15.5 mm对13.1 mm;P = 无显著性差异)或装置尺寸方面无差异。在第1组中,4/21(19%)的CardioSEAL装置出现部分展开,而在第2组中,未观察到CardioSEAL装置部分展开(0/30)。球囊牵拉技术未出现并发症。我们得出结论,从左心房到右心房的球囊牵拉技术是安全的,并且在PFO闭合期间可能使CardioSEAL装置获得更好的最终位置。