Kreder K J, Brubaker L, Mainprize T
Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
BJU Int. 2003 Sep;92(4):418-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04363.x.
To examine the efficacy of tolterodine, an antimuscarinic agent with a bladder-selective profile, in patients with mixed incontinence (MI, stress and urge) compared with patients with urge incontinence (UI) alone.
The study included 239 patients with MI (urge predominating) and 755 with urge incontinence alone from a single-blind, multicentre trial of 1380 patients (80% female) with an overactive bladder. Those completing the trial were analysed 'per-protocol'. After a 7-day washout and a 3-day run-in to collect baseline information, patients were treated with tolterodine twice daily for 16 weeks. The two groups were compared for incontinence episodes/24 h, voiding frequency, nocturia episodes and pad usage after 16 weeks of treatment.
After 16 weeks the median changes from baseline for all voiding variables were statistically significant for the MI and the UI groups (P < 0.001), with no apparent significant between-group differences. The median percentage reduction in incontinence episodes from baseline was 67% for the MI and 75% for the UI groups (P = 0.39). 'Dry' rates for the MI and UI groups at the end of the study were 39% (66/171) and 44% (243/552), respectively, whilst 24% of patients in each group (MI 40/170; UI 130/551) achieved a voiding pattern of < 8 voids/24 h. 'Cure' rates for nocturia and the reduction in the number of patients not using pads used were also similar between the groups.
Tolterodine is as effective in reducing leakage and other symptoms of an overactive bladder in patients with MI as it is in patients with UI alone.
探讨具有膀胱选择性的抗毒蕈碱药物托特罗定对混合性尿失禁(MI,压力性和急迫性)患者的疗效,并与单纯急迫性尿失禁(UI)患者进行比较。
该研究纳入了来自一项针对1380例膀胱过度活动症患者(80%为女性)的单盲、多中心试验中的239例MI患者(以急迫性为主)和755例单纯急迫性尿失禁患者。对完成试验的患者进行“按方案”分析。经过7天的洗脱期和3天的导入期以收集基线信息后,患者接受托特罗定每日两次治疗,共16周。比较两组在治疗16周后的尿失禁发作次数/24小时、排尿频率、夜尿发作次数和护垫使用情况。
16周后,MI组和UI组所有排尿变量相对于基线的中位数变化均具有统计学意义(P < 0.001),组间无明显显著差异。MI组和UI组尿失禁发作次数相对于基线的中位数减少百分比分别为67%和75%(P = 0.39)。研究结束时,MI组和UI组的“干爽”率分别为39%(66/171)和44%(243/552),而每组24%的患者(MI 40/170;UI 130/551)实现了<8次排尿/24小时的排尿模式。两组间夜尿“治愈”率以及未使用护垫患者数量的减少情况也相似。
托特罗定在减少MI患者膀胱过度活动症的漏尿和其他症状方面与单纯UI患者同样有效。