Humphreys Glyn W, Jane Riddoch M
Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):487-92. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02457.
Three experiments examined nonspatial extinction in G.K., a patient with bilateral parietal damage. Experiment 1 demonstrated nonspatial extinction (poor detection of a weak relative to a stronger perceptual group), even when the stronger group was less complex than the weaker group. Experiment 2 showed improved report of a letter falling at the location of the stronger group, but explicit judgments of the location of the letter were at chance. Experiment 3 replicated the object-cuing benefit, though G.K. could not discriminate whether a letter fell at the same location as the stronger perceptual group. The data indicate coupling between object- and space-based attention, so that spatial attention is drawn to the location occupied by the winner of object-based competition for selection. In this case, what cues where. This coupling operates implicitly, even when explicit location judgments are impaired.
三项实验研究了双侧顶叶受损患者G.K.的非空间消退现象。实验1证明了存在非空间消退(相对于较强的感知组,对较弱刺激的检测能力较差),即使较强的组比弱的组复杂度更低。实验2表明,对于出现在较强组位置的字母,报告情况有所改善,但对字母位置的明确判断仍处于随机水平。实验3重复了目标提示的益处,尽管G.K.无法辨别字母是否落在与较强感知组相同的位置。数据表明基于目标和基于空间的注意力之间存在耦合,因此空间注意力会被吸引到基于目标的竞争选择中的获胜者所占据的位置。在这种情况下,目标提示了位置。这种耦合是隐性运作的,即使明确的位置判断受损。