Adams Ann, Bond Senga
Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Primary Health Care Studies, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
J Nurs Manag. 2003 Sep;11(5):293-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00398.x.
This paper explores relationships between grade mix, staff stability, care organization and nursing practice. The data were collected in the mid-1990s from a nationally representative sample of 100 acute hospital wards and 825 nurses. Analyses provides important insights for managers seeking to achieve the strategic aims set out in consecutive National Health Service (NHS) human resource management policies. Hypotheses about ward clinical grade mix were not well supported. Where there was rich grade mix, nurses reported better collaborative working with other disciplines and greater influence. However, it was expected that wards practising 'devolved' nursing would have a richer grade mix and that the latter would lead to more innovative practice and nurses experiencing greater job satisfaction. No evidence to support any of these hypotheses was found although the opposite scenario - a link between poor grade mix, unprogressive practice and perceived lower standards of care - was supported. Wards practising the 'devolved' system rely on adequate numbers of nurses rather than a rich grade mix, and do not necessarily provide a more stable, retentive work environment for nurses. By contrast, findings about staff stability were largely as expected. A strong link between staff stability and standards of professional nursing practice was found, indicating that staff stability is more important than a rich grade mix for achieving innovative, research-based practice. However, staff instability undermined cohesion with nurse colleagues, collaborative working with doctors, and nurses' ability to cope with the workload. Overall, both the papers demonstrate that staffing resources and prevailing ethos of care are more important predictors of care processes and job satisfaction than organizational systems. They identify the detrimental effects on nurses and their work of having few staff and a weak grade mix, and the importance of staff stability. Higher standards of nursing practice are achieved where stability is high, independently of staffing characteristics.
本文探讨了护理人员级别构成、人员稳定性、护理组织与护理实践之间的关系。数据于20世纪90年代中期收集,来自全国范围内具有代表性的100个急症医院病房及825名护士的样本。分析为寻求实现连续出台的国民医疗服务体系(NHS)人力资源管理政策中所设定战略目标的管理人员提供了重要见解。关于病房临床护理人员级别构成的假设未得到充分支持。在护理人员级别构成丰富的地方,护士报告称与其他学科的协作更好且影响力更大。然而,预计实施“分权式”护理的病房会有更丰富的护理人员级别构成,且后者会带来更具创新性的实践以及护士更高的工作满意度。尽管发现了相反的情况——护理人员级别构成不佳、实践缺乏进步与护理质量标准被认为较低之间存在关联,但未找到支持这些假设的任何证据。实施“分权式”系统的病房依赖足够数量的护士而非丰富的护理人员级别构成,且不一定为护士提供更稳定、更能留住员工的工作环境。相比之下,关于人员稳定性的研究结果基本符合预期。研究发现人员稳定性与专业护理实践标准之间存在紧密联系,这表明在实现创新性、基于研究的实践方面,人员稳定性比丰富的护理人员级别构成更重要。然而,人员不稳定会破坏与护士同事的凝聚力、与医生的协作以及护士应对工作量的能力。总体而言,这两篇论文均表明,与组织系统相比,人员配置资源和当前的护理风气对护理过程和工作满意度而言是更重要的预测因素。它们指出了员工数量少和护理人员级别构成薄弱对护士及其工作产生的不利影响,以及人员稳定性的重要性。在稳定性高的情况下能实现更高的护理实践标准,这与人员配置特征无关。