• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于观察性数据因果分析的倾向评分建模策略。

Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data.

作者信息

Hullsiek Katherine Huppler, Louis Thomas A

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 2221 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2002 Jun;3(2):179-93. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.2.179.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/3.2.179
PMID:12933612
Abstract

Propensity score methods are used to estimate a treatment effect with observational data. This paper considers the formation of propensity score subclasses by investigating different methods for determining subclass boundaries and the number of subclasses used. We compare several methods: balancing a summary of the observed information matrix and equal-frequency subclasses. Subclasses that balance the inverse variance of the treatment effect reduce the mean squared error of the estimates and maximize the number of usable subclasses.

摘要

倾向得分方法用于通过观察性数据估计治疗效果。本文通过研究确定子类边界和所使用子类数量的不同方法来考虑倾向得分子类的形成。我们比较了几种方法:平衡观测信息矩阵的汇总和等频率子类。平衡治疗效果逆方差的子类可降低估计值的均方误差,并使可用子类的数量最大化。

相似文献

1
Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data.用于观察性数据因果分析的倾向评分建模策略。
Biostatistics. 2002 Jun;3(2):179-93. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.2.179.
2
Advanced statistics: the propensity score--a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research.高级统计学:倾向得分——一种在观察性研究中估计治疗效果的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Sep;11(9):953-61. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.02.530.
3
A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.1996年至2003年医学文献中倾向得分匹配的批判性评价。
Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2037-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.3150.
4
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.用于估计相对风险的不同倾向评分方法的性能。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):537-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
5
Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.倾向得分法与逻辑回归在治疗效果估计上的系统差异。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):1142-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn079. Epub 2008 May 3.
6
Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.基于倾向得分进行条件设定可能会导致对治疗效果常见度量的估计产生偏差:一项蒙特卡洛研究。
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):754-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.2618.
7
Optimally combining propensity score subclasses.优化倾向评分子类的组合。
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 30;35(27):4937-4947. doi: 10.1002/sim.7046. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.使用增强回归进行倾向评分估计以评估观察性研究中的因果效应。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403.
9
A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.倾向评分方法的比较:一项评估急性心肌梗死后使用他汀类药物有效性的案例研究。
Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2084-106. doi: 10.1002/sim.2328.
10
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.用于估计边际优势比的不同倾向评分方法的性能。
Stat Med. 2007 Jul 20;26(16):3078-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.2781.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer gene identification through integrating causal prompting large language model with omics data-driven causal inference.通过将因果提示大语言模型与组学数据驱动的因果推理相结合来识别癌症基因
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Mar 4;26(2). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf113.
2
Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in distal medium middle cerebral artery occlusion ischemic stroke patients on low-dose aspirin.低剂量阿司匹林治疗大脑中动脉中远段闭塞性缺血性卒中患者的机械取栓疗效及安全性
Int J Stroke. 2025 Jul;20(6):669-678. doi: 10.1177/17474930251317883. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
Application of Dragonnet and Conformal Inference for Estimating Individualized Treatment Effects for Personalized Stroke Prevention: Retrospective Cohort Study.
将Dragonnet和共形推理应用于个性化卒中预防的个体化治疗效果评估:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Jan 8;9:e50627. doi: 10.2196/50627.
4
Residential instability, neighborhood deprivation, and outcomes for children.居住不稳定、邻里贫困与儿童的发展结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):3343. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20846-6.
5
Endovascular therapy versus medical management in isolated anterior cerebral artery acute ischemic stroke: a multinational multicenter propensity score-weighted study.孤立性大脑前动脉急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗与药物治疗:一项多国多中心倾向评分加权研究
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 1;17(e2):e356-e364. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022467.
6
Endovascular therapy versus medical management in isolated posterior cerebral artery acute ischemic stroke: A multinational multicenter propensity score-weighted study.孤立性大脑后动脉急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗与药物治疗:一项多国多中心倾向评分加权研究
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Oct 21:23969873241291465. doi: 10.1177/23969873241291465.
7
Bowel preparation for elective colorectal resection: multi-treatment machine learning analysis on 6241 cases from a prospective Italian cohort.择期结直肠切除术的肠道准备:来自前瞻性意大利队列的 6241 例多治疗机器学习分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr 16;39(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04627-6.
8
A reanalysis: Do hog farms cause disease in North Carolina neighborhoods?重新分析:养猪场会在北卡罗来纳州的社区引发疾病吗?
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 8;9:1052306. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1052306. eCollection 2022.
9
Dealing with confounding in observational studies: A scoping review of methods evaluated in simulation studies with single-point exposure.处理观察性研究中的混杂因素:单点暴露模拟研究中评估方法的范围综述。
Stat Med. 2023 Feb 20;42(4):487-516. doi: 10.1002/sim.9628. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
10
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗大肝癌的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分研究
Surg Today. 2023 Mar;53(3):322-331. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02576-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.