Merrick Mark A., Jutte Lisa S., Smith Michael E.
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
J Athl Train. 2003 Mar;38(1):28-33.
To compare surface cooling and deep cooling produced by 3 common forms of cryotherapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: We used a 3 x 4 x 4 factorial with repeated measures on measurement depth and treatment. Independent variables were measurement depth (surface, fat + 1 cm, and fat + 2 cm), treatment (ice bag, Wet-Ice, Flex-i-Cold, and control), and treatment order (first, second, third, and fourth). The lowest temperature recorded was the dependent variable. The treatment order was counterbalanced using a Latin square. Data were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. SUBJECTS: Fifteen collegiate volunteers who were free of lower extremity abnormalities. MEASUREMENTS: Thigh skin and thigh intramuscular temperatures (1- and 2-cm subadipose) were measured at 30-second intervals both before and during the 30-minute treatments using fine-wire implantable and surface thermocouples. The coldest recorded temperatures were analyzed. RESULTS: Statistical differences were observed for the depth-by-treatment interaction as well as for the depth and treatment main effects. During cold treatments, superficial depths were colder than deeper depths, and all cold treatments were colder than controls at all depths. For the interaction effect at both the skin surface and at 1-cm subadipose, the ice-bag and Wet-Ice treatments were colder than the Flex-i-Cold treatment. For the interaction at 2-cm subadipose, the cold treatments did not differ from each other. Order of treatments did not produce a significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: During a 30-minute cryotherapy treatment, modalities that undergo a phase change caused lower skin and 1-cm intramuscular temperatures than cold modalities that do not possess these properties. These differences were not seen at 2-cm subadipose but may become apparent with longer treatments.
比较3种常见冷冻疗法产生的体表降温与深部降温效果。设计与环境:采用3×4×4析因设计,并对测量深度和治疗进行重复测量。自变量为测量深度(体表、脂肪层+1cm和脂肪层+2cm)、治疗方式(冰袋、湿冰、Flex-i-Cold及对照)和治疗顺序(第一、第二、第三和第四)。记录的最低温度为因变量。治疗顺序采用拉丁方进行平衡。数据采用重复测量方差分析。受试者:15名无下肢异常的大学生志愿者。测量:在30分钟治疗前及治疗期间,每隔30秒使用可植入细线式和体表热电偶测量大腿皮肤及大腿肌内温度(皮下1cm和2cm处)。分析记录到的最低温度。结果:观察到深度与治疗方式的交互作用以及深度和治疗方式的主效应存在统计学差异。在冷疗期间,浅表深度比深部更冷,且所有冷疗在各深度均比对照更冷。对于皮肤表面和皮下1cm处的交互效应,冰袋和湿冰治疗比Flex-i-Cold治疗更冷。对于皮下2cm处的交互作用,冷疗之间无差异。治疗顺序未产生显著影响。结论:在30分钟的冷冻治疗期间,发生相变的治疗方式比不具备这些特性的冷疗方式能使皮肤和皮下1cm处的温度更低。在皮下2cm处未观察到这些差异,但在更长时间的治疗中可能会变得明显。